zero said:especially if the population adds up to a small mining colony on a random moon or w/e.
Absolutely makes sense for someplace like that. For someplace like Earth. not really possible or at all plausible based on business & commerce.
zero said:especially if the population adds up to a small mining colony on a random moon or w/e.
DFW said:zero said:especially if the population adds up to a small mining colony on a random moon or w/e.
Absolutely makes sense for someplace like that. For someplace like Earth. not really possible or at all plausible based on business & commerce.
far-trader said:However your earlier was for an advanced TL15 single world gov Earth of the future. I see no issue with it wanting to nor enforcing for itself the single main world Imperial Interstellar Starport as I briefly described. IMO that is part of the responsibility as a member world.
DFW said:far-trader said:However your earlier was for an advanced TL15 single world gov Earth of the future. I see no issue with it wanting to nor enforcing for itself the single main world Imperial Interstellar Starport as I briefly described. IMO that is part of the responsibility as a member world.
You would see the illogic in it if you had extensive experience in world wide commerce and business.
zero said:Whats going on with the Travellermap.com UWPs??? :?
Travellermap.com UWPs are not based on Mongoose Traveller rules nor source books.zero said:...
Whats going on with the Travellermap.com UWPs??? :?
AndrewW said:phavoc said:A class A starport for any world will have some sort of accompanying highport with it. The larger ships cannot land easily or at all at a starport and therefore will dock at the orbital platform.
Not always.
Traveller Core Rulebook said:Most planets have only a DownPort, a landing zone on the ground accessible only by entering the atmosphere. Ships that cannot land at a DownPort are serviced by a fleet of shuttles and other smaller vessels.
phavoc said:It would never happen. You need some sort of orbital infrastructure to handle all of the traffic. Transferring cargo with orbital terminals/stations is much more effecient than flying everything up/down to the surface.
DFW said:phavoc said:It would never happen. You need some sort of orbital infrastructure to handle all of the traffic. Transferring cargo with orbital terminals/stations is much more effecient than flying everything up/down to the surface.
It makes as much sense as saying that the U.S. would have only one port of entry & exit for all cargo and passengers coming and going from the nation. Just plain nuts.
Super-sized container ships are overtaxing the capability of many ports to off-load that much cargo and monopolizing the limited berthing space. One solution being closely examined is airships (Heliostats actually) to ferry TEUs from the ship to the shore allowing them to offload without closing the port to almost all other traffic.phavoc said:It would be analogous to saying the port of Rotterdam (one of the busiest in the world) is going to let ships drop anchor offshore and all cargo will be transported to/from them via cargo lighters and barges. It would never happen. You need some sort of orbital infrastructure to handle all of the traffic. Transferring cargo with orbital terminals/stations is much more efficient than flying everything up/down to the surface.
atpollard said:Not that nuts if the port becomes the soverign territory of another nation - that whole extrality issue.
How many foreign countries WANT more than one US military base in them?
atpollard said:Super-sized container ships are overtaxing the capability of many ports to off-load that much cargo and monopolizing the limited berthing space. One solution being closely examined is airships (Heliostats actually) to ferry TEUs from the ship to the shore allowing them to offload without closing the port to almost all other traffic.phavoc said:It would be analogous to saying the port of Rotterdam (one of the busiest in the world) is going to let ships drop anchor offshore and all cargo will be transported to/from them via cargo lighters and barges. It would never happen. You need some sort of orbital infrastructure to handle all of the traffic. Transferring cargo with orbital terminals/stations is much more efficient than flying everything up/down to the surface.
So ferrying cargo from orbit (at Traveller's negligible Fusion/MD costs) might not be as crazy an idea as it first seems.
BP said: