hdan said:To keep this from turning into a "matter replicator", which would ruin Traveller's economic assumptions, I would always have printed items be inferior to other manufacturing techniques, at least before TL 15, and even then I would suspect many people would look down on "mass produced crap like that".
Kerenski said:http://www.wired.com/design/2012/11/3-d-printed-moon-rocks/
Would you allow this as standard or special equipment in the Locker of your players' starship ?
dragoner said:The epochs of my TU are:
TL 0-4 Pre-Industrial
TL 5-8 Industrial
TL 9-11 Post-Industrial (the beginnings of an interstellar society)
TL 12-15 Interstellar (post-scarcity)
TL 16+ (beginnings of trans/post-humanism; eg AI's etc.)
F33D said:dragoner said:The epochs of my TU are:
TL 0-4 Pre-Industrial
TL 5-8 Industrial
TL 9-11 Post-Industrial (the beginnings of an interstellar society)
TL 12-15 Interstellar (post-scarcity)
TL 16+ (beginnings of trans/post-humanism; eg AI's etc.)
That's how I have it broken down except TL16+ is unknown
msprange said:Tools for Frontier Living goes into this in some depth - a book _not_ just for 2300AD...
Jame Rowe said:msprange said:Tools for Frontier Living goes into this in some depth - a book _not_ just for 2300AD...
Fine. Make a print version and I'll buy a copy. :wink:
Yes, of course. It is a reasonable technological development,Kerenski said:Would you allow this as standard or special equipment in the Locker of your players' starship ?
phavoc said:For Star Trek geeks, the replicators they used were very common for things like food and drinks, but larger parts and more complicated things were never replicated, but produced the old-fashioned wayl
Captain Jonah said:I always puzzle at the crude level of Star Treks med bay and how little they can do since with Star Trek tech as long as the brain is intact or you have a recent beam log nothing will kill you.
FreeTrav said:I would hold that a shipboard 3D printer is good enough for 'Yeah, I [the engineer] can fab the part, and it'll get us to {mumble} port, but no way in hell can it pass inspection.' {mumble} port can be as much as three jumps away - but putting the fabbed part through the fourth jump is risking a significantly elevated chance of misjump. Or equivalent durability/risk of catastrophic failure for parts that aren't jump-drive parts. I suppose you could also use them for emergency rations with the proper feedstock, but the best you'll get when you program it for roast beef is going to be more like roast-beef-shaped tofu.
The idea here is that I sorta want to avoid the Star Trek replicator trope.
F33D said:phavoc said:For Star Trek geeks, the replicators they used were very common for things like food and drinks, but larger parts and more complicated things were never replicated, but produced the old-fashioned wayl
I remember one episode where Geordi (sp?) said that he could replicate complex engine parts (the part names escape me as I watched it 20+ yrs ago) without a problem. During all of the TV series about the only 2 things that couldn't be made in a large enough replicator were positronic brains & gold pressed latinum.