I see no surface detail! That carrier has big blank panels. A bit of detail, and the lighting makes it look like more... but its mostly curvy plain panels.animus said:The Drakh get surface detail and Brakiri and Centauri don't?! :roll:
Burger said:I see no surface detail! That carrier has big blank panels. A bit of detail, and the lighting makes it look like more... but its mostly curvy plain panels.animus said:The Drakh get surface detail and Brakiri and Centauri don't?! :roll:
hiffano said:The Kabrokta is a cool design, could do with more detail though :-(
The MyrMydon looks a bit, um, err, not EA. the blue star looks pretty whishy though.
emperorpenguin said:I see surface detail but whether it will carry over onto the model, that's the question!
not sure that thing looks Drakh though....
Johnny D said:I've noticed that the Brakiri seem to love ground assaults They have high troups/multiple dedicated assault ships. Not quite what you'd expect from a race of coroprate traders.
emperorpenguin said:there is historical precedent, some would say the US/UK invasion of Iraq was a corporate affair :wink:
animus said:Concerning the Blue Star - what's a "Dual Jump Drive" system?
captainsmirk said:animus said:Concerning the Blue Star - what's a "Dual Jump Drive" system?
Yeah...
Good point actually, they made a great fuss about the WS being jump capable yet so small, then they manage to build something even smaller that can... (though we have to accept that, as it was shown to have jump engines in Sleeping in Light...)
Nick
captainsmirk said:Good point actually, they made a great fuss about the WS being jump capable yet so small, then they manage to build something even smaller that can...
animus said:For a Crusade era WS I'm okay with them getting a jump drive in a smaller ship. I just want to know what the "dual" means. It smacks of a new trait.