How good do you think you are

[JLS83WARRIOR]

How? I ain't seen it but herd abunch about it.

 

[Voracioustigger]

Well, I hope those players who call themselves perfect have never lost a game.

If you never lost a game, technically you are not perfect if you really think about it. If you win every game you don't have the experience of losing so therefore not perfect

So you're perfect if you lose games?

Perfect - "being entirely without fault or defect"

Losing games is a defect. Not knowing how to adjust to an opponent is a defect.

You may win all you games and NOT be perfect, but you can't LOSE games and be perfect.

 

[jamano]

you can lose games and then become a better player and then become perfect

 

[veon]

Well, I hope those players who call themselves perfect have never lost a game.

If you never lost a game, technically you are not perfect if you really think about it. If you win every game you don't have the experience of losing so therefore not perfect

Perfect - "being entirely without fault or defect"

Thats the point, I think you are defective if you have never lost a game, you have never had the experience of losing which teaches you a lot more than repeatedly winning every single game

 

[Battle Forte]

You all have interesting opinoins!

 

[anton970]

I've gone for decient, as I win some and lose some, My army is well painted for bugs and if I wanted to WIN WIN WIN then I'd powergame in the GWS torneys!!