nekomata fuyu said:
Wait, I think I've seen this sketch before...
"Other than armour/redundancy, and TBS, name one thing that people might like if it was in P&P."
"A fixed initiative system?"
"Other than armour/redundancy, TBS, and a fixed initiative system, name one thing that people might like if it was in P&P."
:lol:
In all seriousness, I've re-proposed the armour/redundancy and the main issue seems time needed to test it rather than that it isn't popular.
And yes, the G'Quan in all likelihood will be getting a bit more than the +1AD and +5 damage (and no, it isn't more damage/crew)...hint, hint...
TBS would be unofficial and that's Matt's issue with it. Given that it's unofficial and already widely known here he thinks that's enough. The way I take that is that we ought to step up the usage of TBS, using it in playtesting and tournaments and campaigns!