DFW said:No gun was found with him...
Um.. yes there was. There was a live weapon capable of firing real ammunition. He may well have not fired it, but he had it.
DFW said:No gun was found with him...
barnest2 said:DFW said:No gun was found with him...
Um.. yes there was. There was a live weapon capable of firing real ammunition. He may well have not fired it, but he had it.
DFW said:Yes, just read it. He had a gun on him and out of sight. So, obviously NOT the reason he was shot. Unless, police over there are psionic?
barnest2 said:Now, I think what happened is that a policeman got hit (by a policemans gun) and reported it, which led to Duggan getting shot in response...
DFW said:barnest2 said:Now, I think what happened is that a policeman got hit (by a policemans gun) and reported it, which led to Duggan getting shot in response...
That sequence makes no sense at all.
barnest2 said:Anyone threatening someone with a gun will normally be shot, unsuprisingly...
DFW said:What does that have to do with being shot while NOT holding a gun?
barnest2 said:I was talking about gun law in general in this country.
It would not surprise me in the least. Jean Charles de Menezes' family would agree.barnest2 said:I don't really want to think our coppers shot him without good reason.
Rick said:Apparently, both China and Iran have offered sympathy for those caught up in the riots and requested an inquiry into human rights abuses by UK Police on the rioters. Now that's government-level sarcasm!! :shock:
DFW said:Liam Devlin said:I was deployed there from Ft Ord, CA with the 7th ID. Nobody ever ran over our checkpoint twice...
I lived in Santa Cruz. Too bad Ft. Ord closed. Had friends stationed there in the late 70's.
alex_greene said:It would not surprise me in the least. Jean Charles de Menezes' family would agree.barnest2 said:I don't really want to think our coppers shot him without good reason.