Excel Ship Designer v2025.05.13

Sounds like you need a VLOOKUP hunt to kill them all at one go.
They weren't VLOOKUP though. They were B8< , which took advantage of the naming convention, checking to see if you had Improved sensors or better. I moved that to x38, and did index(match) through all the errors that checked for that.

Edit: Erma Gourd...
 
They weren't VLOOKUP though. They were B8< , which took advantage of the naming convention, checking to see if you had Improved sensors or better. I moved that to x38, and did index(match) through all the errors that checked for that.
That's good. As I added above, you only have 588 cells with VLOOKUP remaining. ;)
 
I’ve finished porting all my ships and had no more glitches. I’ve got a dozen or so pods left to do but I don’t anticipate that I’ll hit anything with them. For my part, I think I’ve found what I could.
 
For the battery-jump express boat, why not just swap out the battery pack with a charged one? The tender is huge and can recharge the packs.
 
For the battery-jump express boat, why not just swap out the battery pack with a charged one? The tender is huge and can recharge the packs.
That would require a battery module, and the costs for a modular hull. It takes a while to change a module. You'd think the tender could charge the batteries in one round after hooking up in a dock/hangar, so that would be very costly for little benefit.
 
That would require a battery module, and the costs for a modular hull. It takes a while to change a module. You'd think the tender could charge the batteries in one round after hooking up in a dock/hangar, so that would be very costly for little benefit.
I've done everything from a TL9 10 ton fighter to a TL14 over the top Zhodani Stealth ship with electronics out the wazoo without anything else cropping up (who knew you could get a 3000 ton ship to cost over 10 billion!)
 
I've ported the last of my pods and hit no other errors. I did find that cells D142 and D143 on the 9b Options tab would benefit from an update to the formula they use. Changing the #,### to #,###.# allows it to have a decimal place while still having commas and those cells are likely to need them. Good work, @Arkathan.
 
Last edited:
More of those Main sensors less than.
I went through all the errors and replaced them with an Index(Match).
2025.05.03e1
Makes me wonder what the criteria is for a day version, verses a letter revision (on a different day) and now a number to go with the letter?
Not that my versioning makes any more sense.
 
Makes me wonder what the criteria is for a day version, verses a letter revision (on a different day) and now a number to go with the letter?
Not that my versioning makes any more sense.
It was the same error... I didn't fix it all the way or all of the fields the first time. So it was e but different.
Errors induced by breaking something stay the same day, with a letter to advance.
Once all of the errors from an update are found, I can go with a new day.

Unless I don't.
 
I've ported the last of my pods and hit no other errors. I did find that cells D142 and D143 on the 9b Options tab would benefit from an update to the formula they use. Changing the #,### to #,###.# allows it to have a decimal place while still having commas and those cells are likely to need them. Good work, @Arkathan.
Thanks for the deep dive. That change will be in the next update.
 
Back
Top