Do we want background/fluff?

Do you want background/fluff for Battlefield: Evolution?

  • Fluff makes a good game great, bring it on!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I don't care either way.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't bother, I like the open-endedness.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
What if we had something that

1) Laid out a write up of common history of each faction up to 2015 in terms of justifying the models we have and the breakdowns of the US/UK relationship and the PLA moving away from support of Russia or what haveyou

2) A selection of fictional hot spots complete with sample campaign maps, fluff. Terrain building tips for the area concerned could be a nice bonus.

Not a whole book perhaps but even as a PDF it could work. You could have one or a series of small docs in this vein similar to the UK/PLA campaign that was in S&P recently. I.E pick some factions, pick a region, invent country/fluff, provide senerio/campaign, job done.

Just a thought
 
If you have some good fluff you can submit it to our newest fiction contest on evocommand.com:
http://forum.evocommand.com/viewtopic.php?t=638
 
cordas said:
I think the majority of the fluff complaints regarding the Forth are more to do with people wanting actually game stuff, but instead being given more and more fluff.

Probably true, although that may be because the "Forth=Tau" faction took their ball and went home a while ago. (I don't agree, for what it's worth, but that sentiment was fairly common for a while there.) Another good chunk of complaints were about the artwork. Which again I didn't have a problem with, but some people take very seriously. I'm mostly looking for a game with Tanks, Infantry and Helicopters, so I don't care if there's some artwork showing camo patterns scheduled to go out of service in 2009 on a vehicle not scheduled to enter service until 2012. But make the artwork, and someone will complain about it.

Personally, I would like a little background on the US/UK split, the MEA "merger", things like that. Nothing too detailed; a broad outline would suffice. But I'm not sure it's worth all the arguments and complaints that would ensue.
 
Xorrandor, it wouldn't be hard at all to toss together a time line. I'm not the one to do it because I'd have my tongue in my cheek for just a bit too much of the content. :wink:

2014: Seeing the United States embroiled internally with a number of southwestern States threatening secession and rejoining with the Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Iran is able to conglomerate many of the independant states in the Middle East to form under a single unifying flag. The dream of a revived Persian Empire is reborn.

Although long separated from the UK, Canada retains strong ties with England, and still shares a common sovereign. The mass exodus of part of the southwestern U.S. population upwards through the northwestern states does not stop at the U.S./Canada border. This becomes the newest "border stress" between Canada and the U.S. since the "Pig War" of 1859.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_War
http://www.nps.gov/archive/sajh/Pig_War_new.htm
http://www.outwestnewspaper.com/pigwars.html

It even becomes named "The Second Pig War" or just "PWII" for short. Unlike the first "war" that cost neither side casualties, this border dispute escalates when Canada calls for assistance from the UK, desiring to halt the unchecked flood of humanity crossing its National border. While not rising to an outright declaration of war (not seen anywhere during the 21st century, BTW), several skirmishes with infantry and armored units does indeed happen before cooler heads calmed things a bit. Part of the "rub" was that the new undocumented immigrants from the U.S. refused to spell using the King's English. Indeed, because of its proximity, Canada had already been previously polluted by spelling 'aluminium' without the second 'i', and enough was enough. Something had to be done about it, after all.

The following is a random grab of text from the internet, and can all by itself be the cause of a US/UK war. Remember, these are not my words: :wink:

---

American vs. British Spelling
"A few years ago in Britain there was some controversy around the fact that some British official body had recommended that English spelling be standardized by the adoption of U.S. spelling, e.g., that "sulfate" be used instead of "sulphate" and "fetus" instead of "foetus". British linguistic purists were outraged and suggested, on the contrary, that English spelling be standardized by the adoption of British spelling. This is typical of the sort of thinking prevalent in that decrepit society, which is continually reliving its "finest hour" sixty years ago, and which seems incapable of change, mainly because change would endanger the wealth and privilege of its established upper/moneyed class (that's why the society is decrepit). Still, it has to be conceded that for resisting the spread of the Nazi tyranny in 1940 the rest of the world owes Britain its undying gratitude."

---

Certainly a better reason for declaring hostilities than over a dead British pig. :lol:
 
BuShips said:
Unlike the first "war" that cost neither side casualties,
---

This is typical of the sort of thinking prevalent in that decrepit society, which is continually reliving its "finest hour" sixty years ago, :

hey a pig and a cow died, they have mothers too! :P


Sixty years ago? No our finest hour (which we never stop going on about) was 40 years ago, the World Cup! Football means more to any true Englishman than a war! Besides we beat Germany in two of the latter but only once in the former! :lol:
 
emperorpenguin said:
BuShips said:
Unlike the first "war" that cost neither side casualties,
---

This is typical of the sort of thinking prevalent in that decrepit society, which is continually reliving its "finest hour" sixty years ago, :

hey a pig and a cow died, they have mothers too! :P


Sixty years ago? No our finest hour (which we never stop going on about) was 40 years ago, the World Cup! Football means more to any true Englishman than a war! Besides we beat Germany in two of the latter but only once in the former! :lol:

Ah, that's it. The Brits finally by 2014 will have had it with the Yanks using the term "Football" and was invading the U.S. in order to smooth out the ball's pointy ends into a proper football. Since another name for an American football is a "pigskin" the conflict name of PWII still works. :lol:
 
As far as the fluff keeping up it can be important, but not "Game" breaking.
Twilite: 2000 [1st ed actualy fortold of the renification of Germany and then when 2nd Ed came out they just revised the fluff to mix it.
Shadowrun has spent its entire life predicting and updateing itself.
Pocket Secratery=Blackberry
Cellular Phones
The Govinator

The only reason T2K died was the GDW Died. As long as the fan base can accept the countinuing updating of the fluff I don't think it matters much.
 
Back
Top