Chuck Lang
Mongoose
Hello! (First post here, thanks for the awesome playtest.)
I have found the page layout on page 71 of the October revision to be a bit confusion with "Significant Actions" getting the larger font heading, but "Minor Actions" getting only the smaller, bold font as though it's a part of the "Significant Actions" section.
I understand, in a way, why Minor Actions are listed under Significant Actions since two Minor Actions can be used to take the place of the Significant Action, and after closely reading most of the actions are described as minor or significant within their descriptions with the exception of movement, but all the other action types get their own major heading or section; it would seem best and clearer if Minor Actions got its own larger font heading for clarity.
Also, is Leadership a Minor or Significant Action? It's listed as its own action with its own larger font heading and doesn't state what type of action it consumes.
Thanks!
I have found the page layout on page 71 of the October revision to be a bit confusion with "Significant Actions" getting the larger font heading, but "Minor Actions" getting only the smaller, bold font as though it's a part of the "Significant Actions" section.
I understand, in a way, why Minor Actions are listed under Significant Actions since two Minor Actions can be used to take the place of the Significant Action, and after closely reading most of the actions are described as minor or significant within their descriptions with the exception of movement, but all the other action types get their own major heading or section; it would seem best and clearer if Minor Actions got its own larger font heading for clarity.
Also, is Leadership a Minor or Significant Action? It's listed as its own action with its own larger font heading and doesn't state what type of action it consumes.
Thanks!
