Just Old Bear said:The painful truth is that European history just happens to be the most diverse, interesting and well documented. There's no escaping that.
I do agree with you, JOB.Just Old Bear said:Many of the races do suffer from the caricatures of the period when the books were written, however.
It's a bad example: The Curse of the Monolith (aka Conan and the Cenotaph), featuring Duke Feng, was written near the end of the 60's by L. Sprague de Camp and Lin Carter, not REH.I always picture Feng the Khitan as some sort of Peter Sellers style villain, for example. :lol:
Axerules said:I do agree with you, JOB.Just Old Bear said:Many of the races do suffer from the caricatures of the period when the books were written, however.
It's a bad example: The Curse of the Monolith (aka Conan and the Cenotaph), featuring Duke Feng, was written near the end of the 60's by L. Sprague de Camp and Lin Carter, not REH.I always picture Feng the Khitan as some sort of Peter Sellers style villain, for example. :lol:
I don't like to think of LSDC/LC (or any pastichers') writings as "accepted Conan canon", but I don't wanna start an argument nor a worthless flame war about it, so we can just agree to disagree on this. 8)
Strom said:I agree with Axerules - there is Howard and then there is everyone else. Movie, animated Aquilonia, prose stories - they all fit into one category - and that is pastiche. There is only "one" bible of Conan and that is the Sprague-less unedited Conan stories in the 3 Del Rey books. The stories in those books are the official canon. Malmberg would tell you that.
Sprague did a lot to market Conan and Howard but his work is still pastiche and non-canon. Malmberg is also doing a lot to market Conan and Howard. But his Hyborian Age world will also be pastiche and non-Canon.
You can't be considered original (canon) 30+ years after the idea.