Recent content by JupiterIndustries

It's fair use for training the model. The output then generates something which is an original work. You're going to be obstinate about it, that's your choice.

Except under fair use. Which is what we're dealing with here.

If you claim you made the original Mona Lisa. Yes. Absolutely. If you create a derivative work, based on your understanding and perception of the Mona Lisa. No. That's not theft. If it were, George R.R. Martin would be in prison for ripping off half of human history.

capitalism is the problem not AI. that's why they don't have these arguments in Star Trek, where you can literally generate wine at will and still have vineyards. Isn't this what the Measure of a Man was about in Star Trek?

People are buying it though!

You literally argued false equivalency by creating a false equivalency to a competitive sport that has nothing to do with business/creative, etc. I mean, Deep Blue literally happened as well, so I'm not sure the point that you're getting at here (and that raised just as many heckles in its own...

This is probably why Mongoose won't release the MGT2E SRD publicly :)

That is literally what Mongoose are doing though by prohibiting TAS usage for people using any AI art in their work? And again, you've gone to an entirely emotive response on whether or not it's worthy of peoples money. Let the market decide. You do not have to buy it if you don't think it's...

I don't think there's any difference. Fair use cannot make a profit and anything generic is not implicitly supported within the context of the Traveller system.

If an artist cannot make a sufficient wage to make a living off of that line of work (again, you pointed out that they don't cost alot, for what TAS content distributors is already not a significant sum) then is it justifiable? And yes, you're entirely within your rights to make that...

That is a situation in which there is insider information over incomplete information. Still not comparable.

It is effectively one and the same. There is no incentive for those who at least want to make a hobbyist wage to develop for Traveller etc. They might as well make their own game.

Yes, yes, I have seen this highlighted multiple times by opponents of AI, but at the same time, someone who is incapable of becoming an artist is not going to suddenly have their intellect diminished because they are using said AI. Their drawing skills are not suffering because they had none in...

Fine. There was nothing wrong with the existing policy, and the change is being presented falsely as an altruistic move. You will see less TAS content period by virtue of what is being done here. There is no actual legitimate justification presented for this change in the announcement. If you...