Cavalier3025
Mongoose
Who else thinks there is still a need for a comprohensive errata? The FAQ did come close to answering all the questions that are out there. In fact there may well be need for errata for the FAQ and certainly clarification for some of the things answered.
First off just to address the FAQ.
The answer on the Prestidigitation question. The questioners point was that it is impossible to have the required cross class ranks in sleight of hand at the level that the Acolytes are granted access to that spell style. The person answering did nothing but repeat the questioners own points and didn't look at the issue at all.
What really should have been asked is one of the BIGGEST questions that still remains unanswered to this point. WHAT ARE THE CLASS SKILLS??? Which is the correct listing of class skills.. the class description TEXT or the SKILLS CHART?? There are several differences for several classes between these two sources of information. Personally my group has already decided that due to the requirement of sleight of hand and such on several spells and the fact that the chart shows that as a class skill for Sorcs.. that the chart may well be the more valid source then the class descriptions. Now I know before someone else points it out that it is possible to use bonus INT skill points to get the sleight of hand needed for prereqs.. but that isn't the point.
I personally want yet another MAJOR contradiction in the book OFFICIALLY resolved one way or the other. Is the skill chart or class text the proper source for class skill information?
The next issue is the answer on the Monster slayer and Power attack question. The final line of the FAQ answer reads "However your total damage bonus cannot exceed your total BAB." This seriously needs clarified. Are you saying that in reference soley to the monster slayer bonus points or to Powerattack as well? This has huge impact for the big beefy warrior types out there swinging away with two hander weapons. I am going to leave monster slayer out of my examples here to hopefully simplify the question I am asking. A 2 handed weapon user with 10 BAB can drop 5 pts of BAB and get a 10 pts damage bonus. But your saying that a 2 handed weapon user could not drop all 10 BAB and gain a 20 damage boost? This differs from 3.5 so that is why this point needs clearing up.
My last issue with the FAQ is perhaps less a clarity issue as the answer is quite clear. It is more an observation of what I feel is simply a very bad choice of rulings.
I was rather suprised at the ruling on the Initiative modifer. Why on earth include Dex bonus twice? If people want really high init modifiers the feats and such exist to grant them that. In Fact this sorta hurts people who do get the feat because a higher dex person can still easily have a higher init bonus then them. It weakens the feat and makes it less useful. Including the BASE reflex save to init calculation is already a really grand thing for classes who get decent reflex saves why make it any more absurd?
There are tons of other questions that others have posted that still remain to be answered. I hope someone with a bit more time then I can recompile the list so that maybe a more comprohensive errata can be published by Mongoose.
-Rob
First off just to address the FAQ.
The answer on the Prestidigitation question. The questioners point was that it is impossible to have the required cross class ranks in sleight of hand at the level that the Acolytes are granted access to that spell style. The person answering did nothing but repeat the questioners own points and didn't look at the issue at all.
What really should have been asked is one of the BIGGEST questions that still remains unanswered to this point. WHAT ARE THE CLASS SKILLS??? Which is the correct listing of class skills.. the class description TEXT or the SKILLS CHART?? There are several differences for several classes between these two sources of information. Personally my group has already decided that due to the requirement of sleight of hand and such on several spells and the fact that the chart shows that as a class skill for Sorcs.. that the chart may well be the more valid source then the class descriptions. Now I know before someone else points it out that it is possible to use bonus INT skill points to get the sleight of hand needed for prereqs.. but that isn't the point.
I personally want yet another MAJOR contradiction in the book OFFICIALLY resolved one way or the other. Is the skill chart or class text the proper source for class skill information?
The next issue is the answer on the Monster slayer and Power attack question. The final line of the FAQ answer reads "However your total damage bonus cannot exceed your total BAB." This seriously needs clarified. Are you saying that in reference soley to the monster slayer bonus points or to Powerattack as well? This has huge impact for the big beefy warrior types out there swinging away with two hander weapons. I am going to leave monster slayer out of my examples here to hopefully simplify the question I am asking. A 2 handed weapon user with 10 BAB can drop 5 pts of BAB and get a 10 pts damage bonus. But your saying that a 2 handed weapon user could not drop all 10 BAB and gain a 20 damage boost? This differs from 3.5 so that is why this point needs clearing up.
My last issue with the FAQ is perhaps less a clarity issue as the answer is quite clear. It is more an observation of what I feel is simply a very bad choice of rulings.
I was rather suprised at the ruling on the Initiative modifer. Why on earth include Dex bonus twice? If people want really high init modifiers the feats and such exist to grant them that. In Fact this sorta hurts people who do get the feat because a higher dex person can still easily have a higher init bonus then them. It weakens the feat and makes it less useful. Including the BASE reflex save to init calculation is already a really grand thing for classes who get decent reflex saves why make it any more absurd?
There are tons of other questions that others have posted that still remain to be answered. I hope someone with a bit more time then I can recompile the list so that maybe a more comprohensive errata can be published by Mongoose.
-Rob