Condottiere
Emperor Mongoose
What if it's mortgaged?
Not anymore. The errata for the Central Supply Catalogue has updated armor layering rules - you can't wear a cloth trench coat over a protective suit at all, only over anti-energy, standard, or archaic armor.You can wear a Trench over it by RAW
Protection Suits are not armor, and the rules on Cloth Trench Coat in the pre-2026 update (which we started with) and the recently introduced "Layering Armour" section in the 2026 update specifies "can be worn outside one other layer of standard, archaic or anti-energy armour". Even if you'd consider Protective Suits as "armour" (because they are in that overall chapter) Protective Suits are not "standard, archaic or anti-energy armour".You can wear a Trench over it by RAW
I still have three main issues with subdermal armour:
1. how much mass does it add to your body?
2, how does the skin still perform its function?
3, how can it not be obvious since your skin layer now has armour fattening it up - does everyone with subdermal armour not look a bit plump in an unusual way?
I did not see this before posting.Not anymore. The errata for the Central Supply Catalogue has updated armor layering rules - you can't wear a cloth trench coat over a protective suit at all, only over anti-energy, standard, or archaic armor.
If subdermal armor is 'military only'
how does the skin still perform its function?
It seems more like the kind of thing you might put in a covert agent. It does increase the risk of detection, though, over what no armour would do. So it is for missions when you really need a durable agent, and they can't have visible armour. At the same time it permanently alters an agent who is likely highly trained and therefore an expensive, high value asset in a way that makes them detectable - they will be easily discoverable as probably some sort of agent with a quick medical check. So it seems like its use would be highly specialized.Just a thought, IMO, the military would have nothing to do with subdermal armor.
It requires permanent expensive life-altering surgery.
It interferes with medical treatment, which may be conducted under battlefield conditions without proper supplies and equipment.
Who knows what long term medical effects it will have, possibly impairing troops after 10 or 15 years.
Hundreds of thousands of discharged veterans will be walking around with military grade subdermal armor, possibly causing a problem for law enforcement.
There are limits to how much armor a surgeon can implant inside someone's body, and will this armor be effective against common weapons, like gauss rifles, ACR's, or even snub pistols with HEAP rounds? Is the cost/benefit ratio worth it?
Why would the military bother with subdermal armor when it can issue body armor of various types, which it can issue to soldiers throughout the life cycle of the equipment, rather than losing it when the soldier leaves service?
There is also the most important military procurement driver, that of cost.Just a thought, IMO, the military would have nothing to do with subdermal armor.
It requires permanent expensive life-altering surgery.
It interferes with medical treatment, which may be conducted under battlefield conditions without proper supplies and equipment.
Who knows what long term medical effects it will have, possibly impairing troops after 10 or 15 years.
Hundreds of thousands of discharged veterans will be walking around with military grade subdermal armor, possibly causing a problem for law enforcement.
There are limits to how much armor a surgeon can implant inside someone's body, and will this armor be effective against common weapons, like gauss rifles, ACR's, or even snub pistols with HEAP rounds? Is the cost/benefit ratio worth it?
Why would the military bother with subdermal armor when it can issue body armor of various types, which it can issue to soldiers throughout the life cycle of the equipment, rather than losing it when the soldier leaves service?
Traveller's game mechanics aren't granular enough to grapple with these types of issues.
It seems more like the kind of thing you might put in a covert agent. It does increase the risk of detection, though, over what no armour would do. So it is for missions when you really need a durable agent, and they can't have visible armour. At the same time it permanently alters an agent who is likely highly trained and therefore an expensive, high value asset in a way that makes them detectable - they will be easily discoverable as probably some sort of agent with a quick medical check. So it seems like its use would be highly specialized.
It might also find favour with paranoid crazy rich people who have many enemies. They need to be the sort of hard cases who would literally allow themselves to be skinned alive for the sake of a little bit of protection.
The SSA of course implants it in all new recruits as a matter of policy.Intelligence agents who are in it for life (no ever leaves the Secret Squirrel Agency).
I agree; subdermal armor seems like something for VIPs, not soldiers. But I was offering thoughts along the lines that Luckmann had laid out -- their GM has ruled that subdermal armor is extremely tightly controlled 'military' technology. It is not my place to dispute their rulings.Just a thought, IMO, the military would have nothing to do with subdermal armor.
It requires permanent expensive life-altering surgery.
Correct. A TL14 world would pick that up in the scan and have established procedures to cope. Microtractor surgery, nanosurgery, etc.Interesting. Imagine if a character with subdermal armor is in a vehicle accident or something, and the trauma surgeons can't figure out how to penetrate his armor to treat him. Or even an older character who needs heart surgery, but his heart is behind TL14 armor.
To be fair, the Cyberpunk ethos is also very much "live fast, die young". And the Punk in Cyberpunk includes body modification kinks.Consider Cyberpunk, with all the electronics implanted in people's bodies and brains. Consider how hot a mobile phone can get after using it for a couple of hours. Now consider the effect those hot electronics would have on someone's brain tissue. But, none of that matters, because it's Cyberpunk, and we're not supposed to look behind the curtain.
You won't hear any argument from me on this point, but I am not the one to decide.Just a thought, IMO, the military would have nothing to do with subdermal armor.
That's just an assumption. It may be true. It might not be, as we don't know anything about the technology involved. There could be nano or biotech components that allow for some degree of growth over time. There might not.Probably does require minimum age.
Since, it wouldn't grow with the rest of the body.
protective knife vests/bullet-proof vests illegalized