SPL's Career Book 2, Reviewed

Jame Rowe

Emperor Mongoose
Careers Book2, published by Spica Publishing Limited, was written by John Griffiths, Nik Kraakenes and Richard Hazelwood. This book continues what started in Careers Book One; like the first, this book introduces a number of careers, and is clearly written and well laid out with good art. It is compatible with the new edition of Traveller by Mongoose Publishing.
CB2 also introduces two alternative background skills options—one based on homeworld and the other on education and intelligence—along with an alternative injury table and a university and graduate school. This is a good addition, as it allows the creation of better-educated characters, though just like in real life it doesn’t necessarily do anything for that character’s intelligence. The book has some additional mustering out benefits: for example, it has surveillance equipment, a sports flyer (a high-speed grav bike) and a new type of ship, the Explorer-class, which is a high-tech vessel which can be used as a step up from the standard Type S ship. My only complaint with the vessel and the sports flyer is that the vessel is TL 15 and the sports flyer is TL 14; I’d have felt they’d do well with TL 12-13 versions of each (but keep in mind that in my opinion, Mongoose Traveller equipment is often introduced at a much higher tech level than is really realistic).

The careers themselves—Athlete, Chancer, Companion, Cosmonaut, Enforcer, Insurgent, Media Practitioner, Mystic Warrior, Politician, Port Authority, Prisoner, Puppeteer, Secret Police and Slave—are, like in CB1, additions to or expansions of (in the case of the Athlete and Media Practitioner) the careers available in Mongoose Traveller. These careers each have three specialties; for example, the Secret Police has Spetznatz, who are the jackbooted thugs, Analyzers and Plainclothesmen—who are watching everything that goes on. These careers are used in the same way that the core careers and the careers presented in CB1, and do very well in expanding the options available for character creation. Indeed, the Prisoner career is a good addition because it opens up a description of what can happen to a fringe character, such as the Insurgent, the Chancer or the Enforcer, or to a military character who gets sent to a POW camp. “Slave” as a career choice may be offensive to some, as it does start the character out as the property of another, but it does allow for a very interesting campaign element to be introduced, even when used to generate NPCs; this is smiliar to the Companion career, which is essentially a prostitute (but depending on your views on the topic, it can be used to create characters like Inara from the show Firefly). But again, this can be used to add color and campaign twists to your game if you are willing to use them.

My primary questions involve the Insurgent, Mystic Warrior and the Puppeteer: an Insurgent, which for this book is the career for those who support a revolution but are not actually fighters, sounds more like an armed rebel such as the Guerilla career in Mongoose’s Mercenary book, while the Mystic Warrior, which is a career path for those who pursue enlightenment through martial art, has a description stating that it would be ideal for an alien culture which pursues such, and the Puppeteer sounds perfect for Hivers. These two should perhaps allow for usage by humans as well. Further, some of the careers, such as the Athlete and Slave, deal with characters gaining addictions to various substances as mishaps; this mishap should be expanded upon to give rules for handling addictions in play.

In short, Spica Publishing Limited’s Career Book 2 is a worthy addition to its burgeoning product line. I recommend buying it, as it provides several new careers and new equipment to the Traveller series, which can be used to expand your campaign.
 
even though that honestly is one giant free ad, I would love if it had proper carriage returns so it wasn't just one huge block of text. I know there are a few in there but they need to be double carriage returns so there is a blank line between paragraphs (and then the paragraphs smaller).

Seriously, I'd love to read it but it's a big run on for me.
 
Yeah that is hard on the eyes (and I edit my posts 2 or more times to try to keep them down in length and readable - and generally fail :( )
 
Free ad? What do you know that I don't? Is his name not Rowe? Is he actually one of the authors listed?

I agree with his run ons being horrible, but I used to be an instructor in the Navy and then in public high schools, so I can handle that.
 
GamerDude said:
even though that honestly is one giant free ad
How so? Jame doesn't work for Spica Publishing. Are you making the assumption that any review that reads "I liked this book" is written by someone directly involved in the book's production?

So, if I say "I have read Robert A. Heinlein's Starship Troopers book and I liked it" does that mean a) it's a free ad for the book and b) I had a hand in writing it?
 
Must admit that the "free ad" part of your post doesnt make sense.
 
Gruffty the Hiver said:
GamerDude said:
even though that honestly is one giant free ad
How so? Jame doesn't work for Spica Publishing. Are you making the assumption that any review that reads "I liked this book" is written by someone directly involved in the book's production?

So, if I say "I have read Robert A. Heinlein's Starship Troopers book and I liked it" does that mean a) it's a free ad for the book and b) I had a hand in writing it?

Indeed. GamerDude, would you care to point out where in the credits Mr. Rowe's name shows up? For the record, I have a copy of the book and no, his name doesn't show up in the credits. The fact that someone likes a product and voices a positive opinion about said product doesn't make them a shill.

Pax et bonum,

Dale
 
Sylvre Phire said:
Gruffty the Hiver said:
GamerDude said:
even though that honestly is one giant free ad
How so? Jame doesn't work for Spica Publishing. Are you making the assumption that any review that reads "I liked this book" is written by someone directly involved in the book's production?

So, if I say "I have read Robert A. Heinlein's Starship Troopers book and I liked it" does that mean a) it's a free ad for the book and b) I had a hand in writing it?

Indeed. GamerDude, would you care to point out where in the credits Mr. Rowe's name shows up?
Wow, there's some misplaced reactions! Relax guys!

I could have said the same thing as GamerDude, as he was just comenting on the fact that the review is so positive it could just as well be an add. It does not give me the feeling of being very critical either, just a general praise - which is ok too.

Maybe Gamerdude could have put some vague disclaimer ("in my opinion"), but you all have no excuse not to keep in mind that on forums one tends to take things sometimes too literally, and figures of speech and such have difficulty getting through.

And just for the record (and a tiny bit of flame baiting, so think twice please before taking the bait):
* Generally it is not an author of something who makes an add for it, those are 2 separate jobs. GamerDude never claimed anything relative to selfpromotion.
* The review is written with many expressions which could be used in abstracts: ie trying to be neutral and synthetic but still trying to "sell" one's work (in the case of an abstract).

All that being said, it does make me want to get it.

PS: I believe some people may be over reacting because of other issues with GamedDude on this board. Let's not mix things which do not deserve to ok? From an outside viewpoint you definitly look like you're ganging up and looking for an excuse to bash GamerDude.

Gosh these boards need a moderator.
 
zanwot said:
I could have said the same thing as GamerDude, as he was just comenting on the fact that the review is so positive it could just as well be an add. It does not give me the feeling of being very critical either, just a general praise - which is ok too.

So he should invent something bad to say about it just to make it sound less of free ad???

If something is good then it's reviewers job to make damned sure others know it's good. Not worry if somebody thinks it's free ad.
 
zanwot said:
...

PS: I believe some people may be over reacting because of other issues with GamedDude on this board. Let's not mix things which do not deserve to ok? From an outside viewpoint you definitly look like you're ganging up and looking for an excuse to bash GamerDude.

Gosh these boards need a moderator.

Bait taken. ;)

An interesting defense as others have done the same as GamerDude and almost everyone jumped on the bandwagon of flame.

And a very good point should be taken from this series of posts.

How you write your text will determine how it is taken. Since we humans rely so much on visual cues it is quite easy for something to be taken out of text or content of what was meant when it is only in a written format.

I would reccomend an old speech writting techinque.
Write what you want to say,
Print it out (preview on the forums)
Read it out loud
Listen to what you say as you read it.
Edit it to make it cleaner, smoother and clearer.

Yea, think I got that hook out of my mouth this time. :)

Dave Chase
 
I didn't have a problem with gamer dude in the "other" thread, heck, I am considered to be one of the problem posters around here, a troll. So I just wanted to know if he had a reason for saying it was an ad, other than it was rather "glowing".

I too looked at the credits and as far as I could tell Rowe is a guy who likes what the product does, which is fine with me, they certainly sound of interest to me as well. Just from their product write ups on their website, not from anything Mr. Rowe wrote, he did get me to find and look at the website, though. So any future purchases made by me are his fault.
 
GamerDude said:
even though that honestly is one giant free ad, I would love if it had proper carriage returns so it wasn't just one huge block of text. I know there are a few in there but they need to be double carriage returns so there is a blank line between paragraphs (and then the paragraphs smaller).

Seriously, I'd love to read it but it's a big run on for me.

I've edited it a bit so there's spacing between sections. Hopefully it'll read better now.

By the way, it's not a free ad - or at least not intended to be. I genuinely did like it, though there is a section with what I found disappointing about the book.

Sylvre Phire said:
Indeed. GamerDude, would you care to point out where in the credits Mr. Rowe's name shows up? For the record, I have a copy of the book and no, his name doesn't show up in the credits. The fact that someone likes a product and voices a positive opinion about said product doesn't make them a shill.

Pax et bonum,

Dale

I should point out that my real name isn't Jame Rowe, and that neither my screen name nor my real name don't show up in the credits.
 
Jame Rowe said:
By the way, it's not a free ad - or at least not intended to be. I genuinely did like it, though there is a section with what I found disappointing about the book.
I'm pretty sure everybody realises that, even GamerDude (though I could be wrong, after all misunderstanding can go both ways, so I can't talk for him). Don't feel in any way you are being accused of any thing! As I was implying in my post you made a valid review, praising something is good too.
You enthusiasm means I have difficulty exploiting your judgment for myself, but in any case you quite extensively list the contents and that is interesting to me, interesting enough that it is motivating me to probably get it: I am particularily interested in the extra things, like alternate background skills systems etc. So thanks.
 
Jame Rowe said:
I've edited it a bit so there's spacing between sections. Hopefully it'll read better now.

By the way, it's not a free ad - or at least not intended to be. I genuinely did like it, though there is a section with what I found disappointing about the book.

I noticed that there was a "Companion" career listed in Drive-ThruRPG's description, but not in your review. Is it actually in there? Or was it so unremarkable that you didnt include it?

Just curious.
 
Dark Lord Skippy said:
Jame Rowe said:
I've edited it a bit so there's spacing between sections. Hopefully it'll read better now.

By the way, it's not a free ad - or at least not intended to be. I genuinely did like it, though there is a section with what I found disappointing about the book.

I noticed that there was a "Companion" career listed in Drive-ThruRPG's description, but not in your review. Is it actually in there? Or was it so unremarkable that you didnt include it?

Just curious.

It is there, and I intended to mention it. It was an oversight on my part which has now been corrected.
 
Boy don't check the boards for a few hrs and ya miss so much fun.

I mean to say that the post looks like it COULD BE and ad, and because it reads just like one for like a website or magazine. I've done book and software reviews for magazines and news papers and it felt like I was reading one of those. (that's a complement).

It's a nice FAN review, I did go and re-read it and it is good. Eh the central paragraphs could be broken into two each, but that's me.

I'll pay a bit more attention to my posts in the future.
 
Back
Top