brook said:Neither side had anywhere to go thanks to a river, some cold weather and nasty Russians (they were nasty to the Germans and Russians who ran... Kommisars). (OK, maybe you can retreat to house next door.) It was just a dangerous place to be.
Bede said:brook said:Neither side had anywhere to go thanks to a river, some cold weather and nasty Russians (they were nasty to the Germans and Russians who ran... Kommisars). (OK, maybe you can retreat to house next door.) It was just a dangerous place to be.
I don't accept that explanation (which is also used in SST). Maybe it makes sense for bugs, but there is a point at which almost any human being will run from danger, even if they have no hope of escape. It's an oxymoron to explain that they won't run because there's no place to run to. That's attributing rational thought to an irrational impulse. When they run they aren't thinking rationally. They're thinking about escape and survival whether it's rationally attainable or not.
Kristovich said:Well, shooting randomly at POW's and stripping them of their cold weather gear never amezed me, it's kinda a part of war...
(I am not a nazi by the way, I'm just saying the Germans were humans as well)
well,the atrocities wreaked on the civilians in conquered countries MAY have something to with that. sure, there was a lot of good germans. but those who were "bad" did more than make up for this(i'm not saying that the soviet gov. was any better mind you-both sides were equally sick in their methods)What amuses me is that the Germans are always portrayed as the bad guys
brook said:Bede said:brook said:Neither side had anywhere to go thanks to a river, some cold weather and nasty Russians (they were nasty to the Germans and Russians who ran... Kommisars). (OK, maybe you can retreat to house next door.) It was just a dangerous place to be.
I don't accept that explanation (which is also used in SST). Maybe it makes sense for bugs, but there is a point at which almost any human being will run from danger, even if they have no hope of escape. It's an oxymoron to explain that they won't run because there's no place to run to. That's attributing rational thought to an irrational impulse. When they run they aren't thinking rationally. They're thinking about escape and survival whether it's rationally attainable or not.
You maybe right. But don't discount the powerful attraction of hiding, cowering, and then doing nothing. In most circumstances, I fully agree that people will run. In Stalingrad, soldiers fought over a single building for days. The tractor factor was a horror show. Maybe soldiers were able to sneek out of firefights, but my guess (only a guess) is that they did so deliberately and slowly, otherwise their own side would have put a bullet into them. Sometimes running away is really a tricky business as soldiers found out during the fighting in the "noman's land" of WWI.
Bede said:Instead, Mongoose chose to explain it as "there's no need for morale because these guys are too desperate". IMHO, that's not a very credible explanation in the real world.
Kristovich said:Yeah, you Yanks got all the glory (no offense)....
The Brits and Canadians got almost no notice later. Truth is, while US Airborne only took one of their objectives at the night to the 6th of June, the British Airborne took all objectives.
I did not intend to offend anyone with this post.