High Energy Turns

HETs were never free for every kind of ship (the NCL comes to mind), only those which were already very sturdy to begin with.

Edit: Hope that didn't sound snarky. Didn't mean it as such. Just trying to point out that it would be complex to track which ships should get a "free" HET and which should get a "safer one". With the ACTA push for simplicity and less record keeping this rule would be an easy one to simply drop.
 
By free HET I was referring to the 2 point reduction on the breakdown roll in the SFB rules (C6.something or other), which made the first HET for many ships essentially a going proposition and that was a generally available effect, with Nimbles getting 2, and auxiliaries penalised from memory- OK not completely free but pretty much.

I understand that the simple option makes it an easy to drop rule, so I was observing rather than complaining.
 
Done this way, it means that freighters can HET... maybe.

Unless they have a lower than average Crew Quality score, which they probably should.
 
If it follows the B5 incarnation of ACTA, the campaign rules had a random CQ chart which noted CQ 2 as civilian. A number of scenarios also had freighters move in the End Phase, so technically they wouldn't be allowed to use any Special Actions at all.
 
The HET rules mean that more agile ships can perform HETs more safely. A Federation ship that wants to pull a one-eighty to bring its photons to bear will take three crits if it fails (135 degrees extra). A typical Klingon, only two. OTOH, the Klingon can take less damage.

HET-ing Gorns will be scary. If the Gorn fails, well, it can take it. And if it succeeds, that's a LOT of plasma coming your way...
 
Iron Domokun said:
HET-ing Gorns will be scary. If the Gorn fails, well, it can take it. And if it succeeds, that's a LOT of plasma coming your way...
That was always the case in SFB - when someone drops that with a fully armed to bear Gorn DN its head between the knees and kiss the rear goodbye....
 
Back
Top