zero said:Curfews for those under 18 are the way to go. I was jumped once by a gang walking home from a night out at 4am, the police made me feel like I was the one who shouldnt have been out at that time even though I was heading home. They also did nothing about it and had the gall to ask if I wanted to meet the gang and talk out my issues - I said only if I could beat the hell out of all them in return.
alex_greene said:Evidence has cropped up that Mr Duggan did not have a weapon ON him.
BFalcon said:Alex: Hmm... when did that turn up? Up till yesterday, he had a loaded firearm WITH him, he just didn't fire it. That was from the IPCC.
DFW said:barnest2 said:I was talking about gun law in general in this country.
I see. Well, good luck with that. I'd rather be able to defend my family and business.
Sturn said:alex_greene said:Evidence has cropped up that Mr Duggan did not have a weapon ON him.
BFalcon said:Alex: Hmm... when did that turn up? Up till yesterday, he had a loaded firearm WITH him, he just didn't fire it. That was from the IPCC.
Just a guess, I wasn't there (like any media reporting on this) but the truth could be explained by: he had a gun in the car WITH him, just not ON him.
It was similar over here until a series of incidents where teenagers killedzero said:Again, I say why do they question a guy in their mid-twenties walking back home from a night out at the clubs being out that late, but not a gang of ten teenagers out on bmxs at that time.