Can someone explain to me why the drive potential tables for m-drive are so different between CT HG and MGT HG?
In MGT, why design a capship without Thrust 6? It's only a difference of 2.25% if the tonnage compared to Thrust 1. Between 5 and 6, it's a mere .75%!
In CT, a Thrust 6 capship mus lt dedicate 17% of it's tonnage to m-drive! That is a significant investment! A Thrust 1 is only 2%. If you ask me, CT has it right.
So why the difference?[/list]
In MGT, why design a capship without Thrust 6? It's only a difference of 2.25% if the tonnage compared to Thrust 1. Between 5 and 6, it's a mere .75%!
In CT, a Thrust 6 capship mus lt dedicate 17% of it's tonnage to m-drive! That is a significant investment! A Thrust 1 is only 2%. If you ask me, CT has it right.
So why the difference?[/list]
