Hi,
First of all, if the mods feel that this somehow go against MPG forums rules or intellectual property, just close the topic as I won't be offended by that.
I've take some side-by-side comparison photos of BF:EVO armor models, together with some 1:72 models I have in my personal collection, just for the sake of comparison.
I'm on the search of 1:64 models, but until then the 1:72 ones will do for the comparisons.
Challenger II MBT

(the 1:72 model is a Easy Model Ground Armor Challenger II)
The Easy Model is greater than the MGP one (?)
Abrams MBT

(the 1:72 model is a Forces of Valor M1A2 Abrams)
The FoV model is smaller.
Abrams MBT

(the 1:64 model is a Corgi Tactical Strike M1A1 Abrams)
In terms of comparison between the models, they are extremely similar in size, as can be seen above. And to compare them with some figures at their side:

First of all, if the mods feel that this somehow go against MPG forums rules or intellectual property, just close the topic as I won't be offended by that.
I've take some side-by-side comparison photos of BF:EVO armor models, together with some 1:72 models I have in my personal collection, just for the sake of comparison.
I'm on the search of 1:64 models, but until then the 1:72 ones will do for the comparisons.
Challenger II MBT




(the 1:72 model is a Easy Model Ground Armor Challenger II)
The Easy Model is greater than the MGP one (?)
Abrams MBT




(the 1:72 model is a Forces of Valor M1A2 Abrams)
The FoV model is smaller.
Abrams MBT




(the 1:64 model is a Corgi Tactical Strike M1A1 Abrams)
In terms of comparison between the models, they are extremely similar in size, as can be seen above. And to compare them with some figures at their side:



