Any Errata yet?

[Exubae]

Not to harp on but is there any errata and corrections due out yet?

 

[Trifletraxor]

Hehe, you're dreaming Exubae!

SGL.

 

[Exubae]

Nahh...
I just live in hope

 

[Melkor]

I believe errata was mentioned as 'almost ready' shortly after the Player's Guide PDF came out.

It seems a wee bit overdue...

 

[Exubae]

In Software Development the comment 'almost' done tends to imply not even started yet!
I get the feeling this is the same in the RPG Development

 

[Exubae]

Are you saving up the errata for one bumper release of fixes?

 

[elgrin]

Are you saving up the errata for one bumper release of fixes?

'Asks innocently'
Wouldn't something that size be MRQ rev 2? :wink:

 

[RosenMcStern]

Don't be too harsh, an errata the size of the Chaosium errata for RQ3, that is two pages, would be enough. In any case I would be content with an errata of ANY size.

 

[weasel_fierce]

what issues specifically are people wanting errata for ?

 

[Exubae]

what issues specifically are people wanting errata for ?

Specifics! lol

For a start - Like to see Eratta for the editing botch in Cults 1.
Then just general corrections for the other books.

Personally I've put a hold on buying on even Glorantha products, until Mongoose manage sort out erata or allow the editing staff time to edit the books correctly rather than turning them in to a confused mess...

 

[Loz]

I'd be interested in hearing from people, off-list, of examples where RQ rules, generally speaking, appear deficient or could be intepreted in slightly dfferent ways to produce better, more cohesive results.

This isn't an invitation to send me all your house rules or have a long whinge about why you think such-and-such ought to do X, Y or Z, but clear examples of where a slight, or even major change, might be worthwhile, why, and, if you have one, and example of where its worked for you.

There is a book in the pipeline where such things can be gathered together, considered, and then presented in a clear format so GMs can use the RQ rules to their fullest effect.

PM me via this board please.

Loz

 

[Trifletraxor]

I

There is a book in the pipeline where such things can be gathered together, considered, and then presented in a clear format so GMs can use the RQ rules to their fullest effect.

Can't they just release a pdf file? I don't like the thought of paying for a book filled with erratas... :roll:

SGL.

 

[Rurik]

I

There is a book in the pipeline where such things can be gathered together, considered, and then presented in a clear format so GMs can use the RQ rules to their fullest effect.

Can't they just release a pdf file? I don't like the thought of paying for a book filled with erratas... :roll:

SGL.

I suspect he might be talking about SpaceQuest, as Matt already indicated that will include enhancements to the RuneQuest rules and be available as an SRD.

Of course I could be wrong. There is a first time for everything .

 

[Loz]

It's not SpaceQuest. And its not a book full of erratas.

 

[Trifletraxor]

It's not SpaceQuest. And its not a book full of erratas.

Then??? TELL US ALL THE MONGOOSE SECRETS!!! :twisted:

SGL.

 

[Rurik]

It's not SpaceQuest. And its not a book full of erratas.

OK, now you are just teasing us...

Is it a compendium (articles from S&P and the like)?

 

[Loz]

It's not SpaceQuest. And its not a book full of erratas.

OK, now you are just teasing us...

Is it a compendium (articles from S&P and the like)?

I know... rotten, aren't I?

Seriously, no details available yet, but watch the boards.

And whilst an S&P compendium is a good idea, it ain't that either.

 

[Rurik]

I know... rotten, aren't I?

Yes. Shouldn't you be "Mongoose_Loz" now?

Seriously, no details available yet, but watch the boards.

I'll try to do that.

 

[Loz]

Shouldn't you be "Mongoose_Loz" now?

So far, it's not in my job description...

 

[elgrin]

I don't suppose it could have something to do with a certain demon sword-wielder?

elgrin

(hopefully)