Recent content by Old Sea Dog

I'm a beta tester on World of Warships now, so I'm glad I didn't waste my time here.

I don't think so. I made an offer to provide technical assistance and research, the guy lives in my area, he didn't even give the courtesy of a response.

Well it certainly has been fun but there seems to be no good reasons for me to participate here, so I guess I'll just move along.

I just recently started playing Victory at Sea on PC, I played with GHQ pewter ships years ago as well as some other table top naval war games. I live in San Jose and would be happy to help you with research. I have a fairly extensive library of books on the subject which includes numerous...

Isn't that the purpose of providing feedback here? Or is this just for casual conversation?

Does anyone care that there are historical/technical inaccuracies in the latest update?

Not much traffic on this site.

The musical score from the NBC documentary series "Victory at Sea" would have worked well with this game, but I suppose there are copyrights and royalties involved with something like that.

I look forward to this game having multiplayer capability. When World of Warships is released in another year or so we will probably see increased interest in naval war gaming.

When a battle ends results should be displayed, which ships were lost, which one's damaged, etc.

Graf Zeppelin provides the opportunity for some interesting alternate history scenarios. Aquila should be included as well.

The Dutch cruiser mounted seven 5.9" guns, not six 6" guns.

As an experienced naval war gamer of many campaigns I have to say I'm really enjoying Victory at Sea. It's simple and uncomplicated, very straight forward, yet provides you with a fairly realistic experience of naval tactics with reasonable historic accuracy. I was glad to see a new navy...