Recent content by mr31337

  1. M

    PBP --- Looking For Players

    Yes Sir, I have one spot open. I see you've joined foxhole53.org forums already, you're welcome to PM me here or there (my user name is "mark" there). However, the Missus is quite literally about to have a baby so I may well be very slow in responding. :wink:
  2. M

    PBP --- Looking For Players

    Just one spot remaining now.
  3. M

    PBP --- Looking For Players

    Classic Adventure on the edge of the Imperium during the Fifth Frontier War! Two spaces for new players have become available in Strictly Business, an ongoing PBP ‘classic campaign’ for Mongoose Traveller. The setting is the OTU during the classic period (1108, the Fifth Frontier War) in the...
  4. M

    Rapid Fire Archery Combat Style

    Has anybody seen any of the video responses to Lars Anderson? Here's one.
  5. M

    Traveller 5

    I think of T5 as a big book of optional rules for consideration should Mongoose Traveller ever be found wanting. I just haven't had need of them yet, and probably won't, ever.
  6. M

    Of Mayday and Missiles, a quick fix...

    Just to add that if you use the alternative (vector) movement rules from High Guard, then, "Missiles do not make a chained task roll for accuracy, but include the range DM from the time they are fired when making the final attack roll on the turn of impact."
  7. M

    PBP Campaign Opening Available

    Ha, yes! Well, there isn't really a short answer to that, but we weren't looking necessarily for a broker-gunner, per se, but somebody with either or both of those skills would have been fine. The character whose slot was being filled was a strong broker who had picked up a little gunnery in the...
  8. M

    PBP Campaign Opening Available

    Regrettably, bobhk disappeared on vacation and appears to be MIA. So currently we are down to four active players, plus GM. Therefore, if anybody would like to join an active crew of strong, consistent OTU roleplayers, shoot me a PM. :)
  9. M

    Additional attack actions?

    You've clearly assumed some meaning in my words that simply isn't there. There was nothing personal or ad hominem or attacking at all. So yes, I forgive you. :) I'm going to have to disagree that the OP is a home brew question. The OP indicates he is trying to resolve the question of...
  10. M

    Additional attack actions?

    Of course they did, what we're distinguishing here is between what additional combat actions are actually within the rules and those which people are just making up. I don't think anybody is trying to say how realistic the rules are, but they are perhaps saying there can be more realistic ways...
  11. M

    Additional attack actions?

    That's seems like it's going to be quite a lot of book keeping. Let us know how you get on.
  12. M

    Standard Missiles - Why Even Bother?

    DT, I'm in complete agreement with you. I never said that missiles are not propelled by reaction drives or gravitic drives, simply that it cannot be those types as listed in High Guard.... but exactly what does propel missiles I don't believe we are told anywhere, so looks like GM fiat.
  13. M

    Book 1: Mercenary Second Edition - Now on Drivethru

    I agree with CosmicGamer. Yes, it is not perfect. This might be what publishers do, but it still doesn't make me want to rush out and buy the book, although I can't actually buy the book as it's not available in dead tree format yet... When it is compatible with the other Mongoose Traveller...
  14. M

    Additional attack actions?

    It seems pretty clear to me a little lower down on pp61 "Attack" that an attack is meant to take a significant action by default. However, I can see you could interpret certain attacks that "do not require the full attention" as only taking a minor action and thus not having to suffer a...
  15. M

    Additional attack actions?

    You can, of course, make up any rules you wish about 'snapshots', however, none of what you propose is in the RAW, so they'd just be house rules. :wink:
Back
Top