Recent content by Drifter

This is indeed happy news for many of us, older players or no. Much as I love Glorantha, I still enjoy more 'traditional' fantasy and have cobbled together half a dozen different takes over the years. I look forward to seeing what this will bring to ferment.

What about a generic setting linked to the old "Questworld" continent, Kanos? Who'd own the rights to that?

I use seven rolls, keep six, with the understanding that if a character is sub par without being interesting, you can reroll.

Brilliant! Thank you, I should have checked for synergy in other sections of the book.

I'm finding the ruling on Starhip building and luxuries a little...vague. The way I'm interpreting it as 1 ton/100 000 per high passage stateroom, but it feels wrong. However, there is no other ratio to link it to... Anyone had this question answered?

Hi foks. First of all, thanks to dayriff for posting this up...I never think to share things around. Thanks for the feedback. I threw this together to make it easier for players to define what they wanted out of specific programs. I used the top-end price (10KCr) as a limiter on what you could...

Agreed in the main. Citizens was a great book for rounding out worlds...and for careers for PC's. I think the setting implies a citizen as being attached to the interstellar worlds in some way. And at that level a lot of citizens take space travel (within system, anyway) pretty much for...

Yes please. I just posted something supporting this idea in the V2 bugs thread: http://www.mongoosepublishing.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=32033&start=45&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight= I think they are essential. I'm just wondering if theres space for Civil/Emergency services in there...

Re: the citizen debate. Just chipping in, but if the book is to be a toolkit for the Imperium and other settings, then a citizen is critical. In many settings (both RPG and literary), just being a citizen of the ruling interstellar elite sets you apart from the various colonials, outbackers...

I suppose what I was aiming at was a 'minimalist fix' which would work for me after reading about the inclusion of opposed skill rolls into the new combat matrix. I was reading through another thread where it was duly noted that the success/success result would only turn up in an exact tie if...

Heres a thought for the new opposed skill combat matrix that might tidy up a few queries. If the opposed test favours the attacker, the matrix is used as is. If it favours the defender, the result is shifted one step in the defenders favour. I’m still thinking through the ramifications of...

The bit I'm curious about is...are there house rules or published articles for this. Seeing as I'm working on my own and all.