Recent content by Cutter

About 1993 :mrgreen:

Doesn't it though? For a pass time that thrives on clear and concise communication, it can be in shockingly short supply at times.

Don't flatter yourself, there wasn't that much to misunderstand. :) And I'm 43, but the wife does love it when I wear short pants. :D Way to get defensive though, top Mongoose marks. :twisted:

Because equating the lack of crowd funding success for an RPG with the deaths of three actual people is always classy...

Shame Herr Miller shat the bed with T5.

Any relation? http://www.rpgnow.com/product/130923/Mercenary-Breed-Core-Set-Legend-BUNDLE?cPath=6426_9133

Total damage? What's your opinion on weapons with multiple damage types?

So assuming the table on page 13 is correct and the example is flawed, the example van on page 27 should have Armour Light Alloys 13 (18 vs Lasers)?

On page 12 of Civilian Vehicles there is an example which reads, "... we have a vehicle with a Base Armour of 7 and 2% of its M3 allocated to armour made from Advanced Composites. This gives a total of 17 armour points on each facing (7 base + 10 additional)." Shouldn't the total armour be 23...

Can anyone who has seen Merc tell me if they revisit and restat any of the weapons first mentioned in the main rule book?

Can anyone with a copy of nuMerc confirm if the FGMP is restatted in it?

So you agree with blackphoenix's interpretation of the chart, that the lack of an explicit value in a row equates to zero?

I understand what you're saying but there is a problem with the consistency of the table deisgn in that regard. Only the first iteration of the weapon has a full stat line. In some ways it's a cleaner layout but unfortunately leads to confusion such as this. I take the layout to mean all...

The TL 15 version of the FGMP does the same damage, has the same rate of fire and weighs the same as the TL 14 version, but costs four times more. Why?