[CONAN] Question about DR

[Supplement Four]

A Cimmerian wears a helmet and a loincloth, carries a shield and his weapons. And, nothing else. It's not an uncommon sight.










Let's talk about his DR rating. I mean, why wear the helmet? To protect his head, right? Well, by the rules, he's got a Damage Resistance rating of 1.

Now, if damage equals or exceeds a character's DR rating, the DR is halved, rounded down.

My question is: Does this mean to a minimum of DR 1? So, a helmet means DR 1 no matter what?

Or, do the rules mean that wearing a helmet, and nothing else, is ineffective? (Because, half of 1 is less than 1 and dropped, meaning DR 0).

The rules don't indicate a minimum DR 1, but it seems logical given Conan's propensity to wear a helmet and nothing else, in the way of armor, a lot of times.

Your thoughts on this?

[Supplement Four]

If, indeed, the rules do not mean "a minimum of 1" when DR is halved, I've got a solution for the helmet issue. See the pics above. Conan is always shown wearing bracers. If you use the optional piecemeal armor rules provided in the Barbaric Warrior supplement, bracers net the wearer DR 1.

So, alone, bracers mean nothing as far as damage resistance goes. But, if you add a helmet, you're sitting on DR 2: Bracers = DR 1 and Helmet = DR 1.

And, this means the barbarian can get DR 1 once his DR rating is halved and rounded down.



So, the question becomes: Are bracers + helmet necessary to get DR 2, halved to DR 1? Or, is there a minimum DR rating of DR 1 associated with small bits of armor, like the bracer and the helmet?



I think I'm leaning towards this second idea.




Brass bracers and helm total to DR 2...

I mean...there must be a reason as to why Conan is always wearing bracers...and sometimes a helmet.

[LucaCherstich]

Sorry for the looooong post but I'm kind of ancient armours/weapons maniac.

I quote from Core Rules 2e, page. 178:
"...the damage reduction provided by the armour is halved (rounded down) for that blow..."
DR 1 divided by two means 0.5, rounded down to 0.
I do not see why a steel cap should protect you more than that.

The Barbaric warrior tables are interesting, they remind me of old good AD&D2 Dark Sun tables for piecemeal armours....but I'm not so sure that table you are refering to is good, and I spotted many errors!
It makes differences between Iron and Steel which is interesting, ... but they do not care wether steel is used for chain mail, plate or scale!
And the variance between Mail, Plate or Scale is kept as important in Conan Core Rules armours!
While Conan Core rules never mentions bone armours...
Furthermore, that table says "brass"!!!
That's crazy! I think the author meant "bronze".
And, if so, I'm not so sure a "bronze" torso armor should protect less than a "iron" armor (but maybe less than a steel one).
Bronze was widely used in Greco-Roman armors even if they knew some kind of steel, and bronze is not less expensive than iron!
Bronze is heavier than iron and steel (so why the author give more sorcery penalty to Steel and why Steel have the same Dex max bonus of Bronze?)

WHY CONAN ALWAYS WEARS HELM & Bracers?
The reasons is that helms and bracers are "cool" for Conan artists!
I suppose the whole thing came from Frazetta's work and 1970s' marvel comics.
The Conan approach to armours in original Conan stories is completely different.
I suggest you to re-read REH and you'll notice that Conan always tries to wear the best possible armour.

You can find a list even in Conan rpg 2e pag. 394-5:
- Mail armour+helm in Frost giant Daughter
- Full armour+helm in Queen of the Black Coast
- Mail armour in Black Colossus
- Off course he wears always the best armours (usually Chain Mail and unless he is prisoner) in all the 3 stories as a King (Phoenix on the sword, Scarlet Citadel, Hour of the Dragon).

When he does not wear decent armour there is always a reason why:
- He is crucified in A Witch shall be born (but later he got mail armour)
- He is at the head of a savage tribe of blackmen (so I guess, very warm, humid climate, bad for metal armours) in The Vale of Lost Women
- he is a poor fugitive wandering in the swamps (so maybe he has thrown armor away to not drown) in Shadows in the moolight.
- He starts as a poor wanderer or thief with no money (Tower of the Elephant, God in the Bowl, Rogues in the House, Shadows in Zamboula).

Now, let's forget Frazetta and let consider Ancient warfare.
It's not the bracers & helm to make a difference...but the shield!
Small Bracers are useless, while helm and greaves should be the decent compendium to a shield (to protect the upper and lower areas not covered by the shield).
But if you do not have shield....it's not the helm to make the difference!
That's why all the warriors who had the economic possibility in a series of ancient societies (from Etruscans to Vikings) looked for torso protection after they got the shield (and unless they were crazy alcoholic berserkers...).
There's a reason why most Roman gladiators (excepting the Retiarius and Dimachaerus) had helms and shields but rarely had torso protection...the shield is their main defence, and if they were not skillfull in using it, they had to die in horrible ways to entertain the public.
All of the opposite for Roman legionaries or Greek Hoplites.
even if they had large shields they looked for torso protection, since helm and greaves were not enough!

[Kev]

Just as food for thought, a couple of years ago someone on this very forum (I'm afraid I can't recall who) suggested an alternate way of using helms/helmets. I have not implemented or tried this alternate in my game, so I can't say whether it's good or bad but it's interesting nonetheless.

I copy a portion of his post here for your perusal (with minor editorial changes for clarity):

Helmet: +2 DV versus Critical Threat confirmation rolls

Helm: +4 DV versus Critical Threat confirmation rolls

Visored Helm: +2/+4 DV versus Critical Threat confirmation rolls (depending on whether the visor is up or down)

-- This is in lieu of having them add DR for armour worn.

-- This means that it is worthwhile wearing a helm(et) even if no armour is worn (a fairly common occurence).

-- So, as they protect the most vital portion of a target's body, they will make it less likely that a critical hit is scored--but no less likely for the target to be hit in general.

-- For simplicity, if the DV bonus makes the difference between taking a critical and not, you can assume that the helm(et) is dented--either ruined completely, or you can reduce its DV bonus by 1 (perhaps by 2 vs a x3 strike, and by 3 vs a x4 strike--depends on how complicated you want to get).

[Supplement Four]

@Kev

Interesting idea!

I quote from Core Rules 2e, page. 178:
"...the damage reduction provided by the armour is halved (rounded down) for that blow..."
DR 1 divided by two means 0.5, rounded down to 0.
I do not see why a steel cap should protect you more than that.

Because Conan wears a helm and no other armor, except for bracers, a lot--at least from the pics.

That means, to me, that the universe begs for there to be a reason that this happens.

It makes differences between Iron and Steel which is interesting, ... but they do not care wether steel is used for chain mail, plate or scale!

It's probably a granularity issue. The important thing (and I haven't tested this) is if adding up all the individual pieces will get you the same DR as that printed in the Core rules for the same type of armor.

WHY CONAN ALWAYS WEARS HELM & Bracers?
The reasons is that helms and bracers are "cool" for Conan artists!
I suppose the whole thing came from Frazetta's work and 1970s' marvel comics.
The Conan approach to armours in original Conan stories is completely different.
I suggest you to re-read REH and you'll notice that Conan always tries to wear the best possible armour.

I've read just about all the Howard stories...just a few more to go.