Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Discuss the Traveller RPG and its many settings
Moppy
Greater Spotted Mongoose
Posts: 932
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2015 12:42 pm

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby Moppy » Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:16 am

before i get into ships designed designed to operate as breakaways, lets say i dock 2 ordinary ships together

what's the limit on their maneuvering? i couldnt find anything in the rules

I cant find an acceleration limit for large craft externally docked onto a dispersed structure either (i don't remember the mongoose name)

i also couldnt find anything for power transfer between docked ships
AnotherDilbert
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 3868
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:49 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby AnotherDilbert » Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:31 am

None of the situations has specific rules, as far as I know. Use Referee discretion.

Moppy wrote: before i get into ships designed designed to operate as breakaways, lets say i dock 2 ordinary ships together

what's the limit on their maneuvering? i couldnt find anything in the rules
I would say none; docked simply means mated airlocks. If you want to accelerate together you need Docking Clamps to hold them together.

Moppy wrote: I cant find an acceleration limit for large craft externally docked onto a dispersed structure either (i don't remember the mongoose name)
Configuration "Dispersed Structure". No specific limitation, Docking Clamps needed and can handle acceleration.

Moppy wrote: i also couldnt find anything for power transfer between docked ships
None, unless you take a few hours to bodge something. I would allow specialised UNREP Equipment to handle power.
baithammer
Greater Spotted Mongoose
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:21 am

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby baithammer » Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:34 am

When a ship docks or undocks, neither ship can expend thrust or engage in combat for the duration of the docking sequence and the mainship is treated as unstreamlined and you need to recalculate thrust / jump as the combined displacement.
The total craft is "a ship". The sub-craft are "sections" with specific rules separate from the general design sequence.
Should check it against the Elemental Cruiser designs, as it uses the same basis as the breakaway hull minus the docking connector.
AnotherDilbert
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 3868
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:49 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby AnotherDilbert » Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:05 pm

AnotherDilbert wrote:
AndrewW wrote: Each section is it's own. If a section is big enough for a hardpoint it has the usual amount.
Thank you, this certainly changes how I will use this...
Example: Take this Franken-Scout:
It is a breakaway design with three sections of 35.2 Dt each. Each section has two firmpoints and a missile barbette, for a total of three barbettes. One section is a landing section with 4 G and Armour 6, the other sections have 1 G and Armour 3, for a total of 2 G and Armour 4 (if we average Armour). One section has a 10 Dt bridge, the others a 3 Dt small craft bridge. All sections has a m/15 computer and a m/10 backup. The bridge section has a Military sensor suite, the others have Basic sensors.

Ammunition is limited, but it can launch 15 missiles per round. That should be enough to make a corsair hesitate...

Total craft:
Image
AnotherDilbert
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 3868
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:49 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby AnotherDilbert » Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:23 pm

Tribarrel Battlecruiser:

150 kDt divided into three identical 50 kDt breakaway sections, each with a meson spinal, 200 barbettes, 235 turrets, and 5 fixed mounts.

The total ship has three spinals, much easier to overwhelm the enemies' dodging...

The total ship has 110000 Hull, so each section has 36666 Hull.

Image
AndrewW
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 4259
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:57 pm

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby AndrewW » Fri Apr 12, 2019 3:10 pm

Moppy wrote:
Fri Apr 12, 2019 11:16 am
i also couldnt find anything for power transfer between docked ships
While there isn't specific rules, there is mention of this: (High Guard, page: 108, Express Boat)
High Guard wrote:The jump drive is powered by the battery, which is recharged during the normal refuelling operations.
baithammer
Greater Spotted Mongoose
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:21 am

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby baithammer » Sat Apr 13, 2019 1:37 am

AnotherDilbert wrote:
Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:23 pm
The total ship has 110000 Hull, so each section has 36666 Hull.
Did some checking with the ECC designs and the hull points for the pods are done from the pods displacement and not from the total hull points. (

Amara class total displacement = 75,000dt = 41,250 hull points

Pod total displacement = 2,600dt = 3.47% of total hull and expected value = 1,431 hull points

Pod actual Hull points = 1,144 Hull points - (2,600 / 2.5 = 1,040 x1.1 = 1,144)

Which is consistent with the pod having its Hull points based on its own displacement.
Condottiere
Chief Mongoose
Posts: 7375
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:23 pm

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby Condottiere » Sat Apr 13, 2019 2:43 am

1. I suspect the rule was added to give some more colour to the design process, and as I recall, Tee Five also was more clear on subhulls.

2. It's pretty much subject to potential abuse, such as multiple spinal mounts, in that actually no real reason you couldn't have multiples per hull, except for game balance, as yup easi;y could clamp multiple minor meson spinal mounted hulls onto a pure rocket master hull, but we restrain ourselves from doing so or permitting it.

3. Analysis indicates that one hundred and five tonnes of hull could be used to create four firmpoints.

4. I don't care if I had to add an extra tonne to create a hardpoint: it would result in a two tonne turret, a six tonne barbette, a twenty one tonne point defence weapon system, and a fifty one tonne small bay; I tend to think that turrets are too small anyway to cram in that amount of weapons systems, and would look forward as everyone scrambles to recalculate their ship designs.

5. The current firmpoint rules are a reaction against min maxing smallcraft to create overwhelming firepower, in a pretty much same doctrinal manner as the battle rider strategy, and maybe to recreat that Star Wars ambiance. Was it well thought out? Probably not, since only after the fact ruling permitted missile range to go beyond obvious firmpoint range restrictions, and why on earth can you combine two firmpoints and have a five tonne barbette, and not a dual one tonne turret?

6. As regards to having a spaceship act as a platform for armed vehicles, I already have decided to add a howdah, gantries and gondolas to my SpaceBalls, to let the CAVALRY have a look down, shoot down capability, as the SpaceBalls glide across the countryside; since performance is affected by volume, not actual weight, they're all open topped, though you could just as easily open a cargo hatch, park them in the hold, and shoot from there, which is what I had intended to do with a meson sled.

7. I the two percent wastage was fixed, you could easily blister the hull with ten tonne blisters, and give each a missile launcher.
baithammer
Greater Spotted Mongoose
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:21 am

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby baithammer » Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:17 am

I tend to think that turrets are too small anyway to cram in that amount of weapons systems, and would look forward as everyone scrambles to recalculate their ship designs.
The displacement taken up in the hull is only the connector for the turret not the actual turret itself. ( Same as the difference between a drop tank and the drop tank connector.)
why on earth can you combine two firmpoints and have a five tonne barbette, and not a dual one tonne turret?
Have a feeling that is to allow for torpedoes, as the smallest platform for torpedoes is the barbette. ( The new container rules require hard point in order to mount a torpedo container.)
I the two percent wastage was fixed, you could easily blister the hull with ten tonne blisters, and give each a missile launcher.
Two limitations.

1.) More space needed for the gunners
2.) Firm point missile racks and barbettes have to be reloaded more often. ( 4 in rack / normally 12 and 8 in barbette / normally 25)

Here's a tweak that might balance things out.

1.) Instead of 1 firm point under 35t, 2 firm point 35t-70t, 3 firm points 71t+ , do 1 hard point for 71t+
2.) Remove Barbette from firm points
3.) Require turret to take up 2 firm points
AnotherDilbert
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 3868
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:49 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby AnotherDilbert » Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:29 am

baithammer wrote: Did some checking with the ECC designs and the hull points for the pods are done from the pods displacement and not from the total hull points.
Pods are not breakaway sections, but follow their own rules.

HG, p12, Breakaway Hulls wrote:Hull points of each section will be proportionate to the total Hull points of the ship.
Condottiere
Chief Mongoose
Posts: 7375
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:23 pm

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby Condottiere » Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:29 am

Originally, torpedoes were external one shot launchers, affixed one per firmpoint.
baithammer
Greater Spotted Mongoose
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:21 am

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby baithammer » Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:54 am

AnotherDilbert wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 7:29 am
baithammer wrote: Did some checking with the ECC designs and the hull points for the pods are done from the pods displacement and not from the total hull points.
Pods are not breakaway sections, but follow their own rules.

HG, p12, Breakaway Hulls wrote:Hull points of each section will be proportionate to the total Hull points of the ship.
The pods use the same construction as a breakaway hull minus the connector, such as having a bridge in the pod with its own power source.

As to proportionate, the total of each sections hull points is the total Hull points of the ship and is borne out by the closest design we have to the breakaway with the ECC designs.
AnotherDilbert
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 3868
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:49 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby AnotherDilbert » Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:20 am

baithammer wrote: The pods use the same construction as a breakaway hull minus the connector, such as having a bridge in the pod with its own power source.
Pods are explicitly not breakaway sections.
Element Class Cruisers, Naval Architect Notes wrote: Installing pods is a dockyard job requiring several weeks of work, as they become an integral part of the final design and are not a detachable or breakaway component.
baithammer
Greater Spotted Mongoose
Posts: 912
Joined: Wed May 31, 2017 2:21 am

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby baithammer » Sun Apr 14, 2019 12:06 pm

AnotherDilbert wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:20 am
baithammer wrote: The pods use the same construction as a breakaway hull minus the connector, such as having a bridge in the pod with its own power source.
Pods are explicitly not breakaway sections.
Element Class Cruisers, Naval Architect Notes wrote: Installing pods is a dockyard job requiring several weeks of work, as they become an integral part of the final design and are not a detachable or breakaway component.
You missed the point in that the mechanics follow a breakaway hull but without the connector, hence why it takes weeks of shipyard work to change them up.
AnotherDilbert
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 3868
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:49 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Breakaway Hulls and turrets

Postby AnotherDilbert » Sun Apr 14, 2019 5:35 pm

baithammer wrote: You missed the point in that the mechanics follow a breakaway hull but without the connector, ...
I did not miss it, I disagree with it.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: PFarrell and 26 guests