..and round we go again.
Matt: can you please give us your interpretation of this rule?
[Traveller 2e] Psionics and range band confusion
- Gruffty the Hiver
- Greater Spotted Mongoose
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: MK, UK
-
- Cosmic Mongoose
- Posts: 4316
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:49 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: [Traveller 2e] Psionics and range band confusion
Sorry, I fail to see the problem?
Assault does damage. Damage is defined on p74 to be against physical characteristics.
It may have worked differently in other editions, but that was then?
Assault does damage. Damage is defined on p74 to be against physical characteristics.
It may have worked differently in other editions, but that was then?
- ShawnDriscoll
- Cosmic Mongoose
- Posts: 3003
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:13 pm
Re: [Traveller 2e] Psionics and range band confusion
Damage is damage. See rule for when Travelers become damaged goods. Otherwise, the Referee gets to use Rule Zero if trying to tell a story to their players.Gruffty the Hiver wrote: ↑Sat Nov 24, 2018 8:31 pmBut where does that damage get applied? The core rulebook doesn't say.
Re: [Traveller 2e] Psionics and range band confusion
A lot of these discussions could be addressed adequately for most GMs through judicious application of Rule Zero....
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests