Airlocks

Discuss the Traveller RPG and its many settings
phavoc
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 4766
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:13 pm

Airlocks

Postby phavoc » Tue Sep 08, 2015 12:49 pm

Pg143 – Airlocks: “Ships with cargo space have cargo hatches, allowing up to 10% of their cargo to be transferred at any one time”. This should be clarified to read ships with cargo holds that can be accessed via an external cargo hatch. Some ships have cargo holds inside with no direct access to the outside. And the “at one time” is not a time reference. Ships should be able to transfer 10% of their cargo per turn, per hour?
AKAramis
Greater Spotted Mongoose
Posts: 1440
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:57 am
Location: Eagle River, Alaska, USA
Contact:

Re: Airlocks

Postby AKAramis » Thu Sep 10, 2015 1:05 am

I believe the intent was that the cargo airlocks should total about 10% of the size of the cargo hold... which has no firm basis in prior Traveller canon. Certain deckplans show 5-8% of the cargo volume as cargo locks. Others have no locks at all.

Then again, many of the deckplans are BADLY broken in CT... (many are only correct if you assume 1m squares and/or 2m or 2.5m decks, rather than the specified in CT S7 3m decktop to ceiling.)
-AKAramis
==================================================
Never catch a tiger by the tail...
... unless it is sedated or dead.
==================================================
http://aramis.hostman.us
Condottiere
Chief Mongoose
Posts: 7318
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:23 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby Condottiere » Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:08 am

May actually be dependent more on common commercial container size and configurations.
phavoc
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 4766
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:13 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby phavoc » Thu Sep 10, 2015 2:02 pm

Condottiere wrote:May actually be dependent more on common commercial container size and configurations.
Yup.
AKAramis wrote:I believe the intent was that the cargo airlocks should total about 10% of the size of the cargo hold... which has no firm basis in prior Traveller canon. Certain deckplans show 5-8% of the cargo volume as cargo locks. Others have no locks at all.

Then again, many of the deckplans are BADLY broken in CT... (many are only correct if you assume 1m squares and/or 2m or 2.5m decks, rather than the specified in CT S7 3m decktop to ceiling.)
You are right, there's no clarification in the canon materials. Which is why with the newly-proposed rule that would be added to canon that it gets clarified and fixed at the time of publication. Reducing the number of broken rules prior to publication is a wonderful thing!
AKAramis
Greater Spotted Mongoose
Posts: 1440
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 5:57 am
Location: Eagle River, Alaska, USA
Contact:

Re: Airlocks

Postby AKAramis » Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:47 pm

Condottiere wrote:May actually be dependent more on common commercial container size and configurations.
Agreed.

However - some will likely use a vehicle berth, instead... such as an ATV berth... because of operational considerations.

I think it's a case where defining it is counterproductive.
-AKAramis
==================================================
Never catch a tiger by the tail...
... unless it is sedated or dead.
==================================================
http://aramis.hostman.us
phavoc
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 4766
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:13 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby phavoc » Thu Sep 10, 2015 7:35 pm

AKAramis wrote:I think it's a case where defining it is counterproductive.
How can defining a standard to work from be worse than defining no standard? People already drop/modify rules to start with - but at least they have a place to begin with.

"A ship with a dedicated cargo bay may load/unload a cargo hold's capacity at 10% per hour. If appropriate equipment and personnel are available all cargo holds may be unloaded simultaneously. Unused vehicle bays may also be used for cargo storage. Loading and unloading rates should be determined by the referee (Ex - The Empress Marava wants to transport an additional 4 Dtons of cargo in it's empty air/raft hangar. The referee determines a pair of 2 Dton containers can be loaded over the span of 1hr, or it can be manually stacked full of crates in 6hrs."

A baseline has been established from which to work with, you've provide flexibility for a ref/players to make adjustments or fill in the gaps, and they STILL can drop/modify/add to the rule.

So.... how would something like that be counterproductive again?
Rikki Tikki Traveller
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:20 pm
Location: Arlington, TX USA

Re: Airlocks

Postby Rikki Tikki Traveller » Fri Sep 11, 2015 2:23 pm

Also, it should be clearly stated if the cargo locks are airlocks or just air-tight doors. It can make a difference. Most of the standard designs assume they are air-tight doors, but not airlocks, so you cannot transfer cargo out of the hold while floating in orbit and move it to another ship (using the Spider...) without depressurizing your cargo compartment. Fine for some ships, but if you have a Standard or Dispersed Hull, your ship isn't designed to land and since you have stated that Highports are rare, then you have to have a way to transfer cargo in a pressurized environment.
My friends call me Richard.
You can call me Sir.
AndrewW
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 4248
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:57 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby AndrewW » Fri Sep 11, 2015 4:44 pm

Rikki Tikki Traveller wrote:Fine for some ships, but if you have a Standard or Dispersed Hull, your ship isn't designed to land and since you have stated that Highports are rare, then you have to have a way to transfer cargo in a pressurized environment.
I wouldn't say transferring cargo in a pressurized environment is required. Can be useful at times though.
phavoc
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 4766
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 6:13 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby phavoc » Fri Sep 11, 2015 8:59 pm

Rikki Tikki Traveller wrote:Also, it should be clearly stated if the cargo locks are airlocks or just air-tight doors. It can make a difference. Most of the standard designs assume they are air-tight doors, but not airlocks, so you cannot transfer cargo out of the hold while floating in orbit and move it to another ship (using the Spider...) without depressurizing your cargo compartment. Fine for some ships, but if you have a Standard or Dispersed Hull, your ship isn't designed to land and since you have stated that Highports are rare, then you have to have a way to transfer cargo in a pressurized environment.
I've yet to see a ship design that has actual cargo bay airlocks. Every published design I can think of simply has cargo bay doors. Well, there is the Type-R that has multiple holds, so technically it could depressurize one at a time. But essentially all cargo ships have only had access doors, requiring a full depressurization.
Condottiere
Chief Mongoose
Posts: 7318
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:23 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby Condottiere » Sat Sep 12, 2015 6:42 am

I can think of that fight scene between the Queen and Weaver in Aliens; other than that, I think the cargo bay itself becomes the airlock, exposed to the elements.
Rikki Tikki Traveller
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 3409
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:20 pm
Location: Arlington, TX USA

Re: Airlocks

Postby Rikki Tikki Traveller » Sat Sep 12, 2015 10:24 pm

Only if the cargo containers are vacuum rated.
My friends call me Richard.
You can call me Sir.
Condottiere
Chief Mongoose
Posts: 7318
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:23 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby Condottiere » Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:23 am

Depends on where you open the cargo hatch; if it's on the ground or directly into the starport, not really a problem.
Captain Jonah
Duck-Billed Mongoose
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:58 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Airlocks

Postby Captain Jonah » Mon Sep 14, 2015 11:49 am

Condottiere wrote:Depends on where you open the cargo hatch; if it's on the ground or directly into the starport, not really a problem.
More of a problem when you're moving cargo between ships in space, for example transferring the cargo from that captured ship over to your own freighter after the warship did the pirating or transferring goods between smugglers out of sensor range of the Law. Erm I mean the sort of legitimate reasons people have for transferring cargo in hostile environments. Cough.

Its a bit like the 2 weeks fuel on all the ships. They are designed for a sedate Imperium where ships fly from port to port and always open the doors to a space station or downport. Where everything is safe and secure.

None of them are designed or planned for actual adventure or combat, not even the military ships or frontier designs. It's like the simplification of dropping hardpoints because they aren't needed then setting the new campaign in the Trojan reaches. What sort of moron is building ships there that don't have the maximum number of hardpoints on the hull from the start!
Traveller: Nonsense, those rumours about me and crashes, no truth in them at all. I never had a landing I didn't walk away from!

ACTA-SF: Who are we, GORN. What do we want, Cruisers that can turn.... Wait, OK Escorts... Wait. I'll get back to you !
Condottiere
Chief Mongoose
Posts: 7318
Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2013 8:23 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby Condottiere » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:15 pm

If making an impromptu transfers between two ships in space, handling, proper or otherwise, would be the major concern of the one recipient, and not something he may want to roll for.

Non-careful recipients should find themselves rolling a lot.

This might explain why I'm such a big fan of solar energy (panels).
AndrewW
Cosmic Mongoose
Posts: 4248
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 11:57 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby AndrewW » Mon Sep 14, 2015 6:07 pm

Captain Jonah wrote:More of a problem when you're moving cargo between ships in space, for example transferring the cargo from that captured ship over to your own freighter after the warship did the pirating or transferring goods between smugglers out of sensor range of the Law. Erm I mean the sort of legitimate reasons people have for transferring cargo in hostile environments. Cough.
That's ok, we'll just blame it all on the gorilla.
msprange
Site Admin
Posts: 14754
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 4:25 pm

Re: Airlocks

Postby msprange » Wed Sep 16, 2015 1:38 pm

Just a quick note here - we are very much generalising this in the Core book. High Guard has specific rules for airlocking cargo doors.
Matthew Sprange

Mongoose Publishing
http://www.mongoosepublishing.com

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Sigtrygg and 11 guests