Anybody got world at war evo..?
Anybody got world at war evo..?
I`m i the only one that got the new rules..!!!!
Alan-Uk
Alan-Uk
- Ali the conqueror
- Weasel
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:23 pm
-
- Banded Mongoose
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:50 pm
- lastbesthope
- Executive Mongoose
- Posts: 19697
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Contact:
Re: Anybody got world at war evo..?
Acquired one at Salute on Sudaysoulman wrote:I`m i the only one that got the new rules..!!!!
Alan-Uk
LBH
Yep got mine at Salute - can't leave Salute without a new set of ules to read!
So far so good - I will play these rules - my only questions at the moment are:
1) no thompson SMGs are listed and no stats given for allied forces just M3 grease guns instead - thats a bit wrong afaik ww2
2) can a figure benefit from both an Obscured LOS and Cover - if not why not?
cheers
So far so good - I will play these rules - my only questions at the moment are:
1) no thompson SMGs are listed and no stats given for allied forces just M3 grease guns instead - thats a bit wrong afaik ww2
2) can a figure benefit from both an Obscured LOS and Cover - if not why not?
cheers
Yes i know what you mean, but its still a smg etc..!!
As for the Obscured LOS and Cover , i thought obscured was lt cover, which is a +1 to kill only..?
I`m off to bed for another read, it was the only rules i picked up from salute, and some nice changes and new stuff, but as you said they is a few little things missing or mis placed, ie/ bombs and not rockets on the typhoon, but a army book would sort that out, i was thinking using the campaigh rules from old evo with WAW..
As for the Obscured LOS and Cover , i thought obscured was lt cover, which is a +1 to kill only..?
I`m off to bed for another read, it was the only rules i picked up from salute, and some nice changes and new stuff, but as you said they is a few little things missing or mis placed, ie/ bombs and not rockets on the typhoon, but a army book would sort that out, i was thinking using the campaigh rules from old evo with WAW..
- lastbesthope
- Executive Mongoose
- Posts: 19697
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Contact:
-
- Lesser Spotted Mongoose
- Posts: 523
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 2:26 am
- Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Mine turned up in the post today - and I'm in Australia! Good work people!
I too was surprised it was in black and white but it's still pretty good. Nice to see the Engangement matrix is still around. I would have liked the 'Stream' trait to have remained for flamethrowers. Still, that's a trifle.
Looking forward to demoing this but I have to wait for my Bolt-Action-via-Mongoose order to get here - probably some weeks away
.
Cheers
Mark
I too was surprised it was in black and white but it's still pretty good. Nice to see the Engangement matrix is still around. I would have liked the 'Stream' trait to have remained for flamethrowers. Still, that's a trifle.
Looking forward to demoing this but I have to wait for my Bolt-Action-via-Mongoose order to get here - probably some weeks away

Cheers
Mark
Question #2 was expertly answered by LBH above.Troll66 wrote:Yep got mine at Salute - can't leave Salute without a new set of ules to read!
So far so good - I will play these rules - my only questions at the moment are:
1) no thompson SMGs are listed and no stats given for allied forces just M3 grease guns instead - thats a bit wrong afaik ww2
2) can a figure benefit from both an Obscured LOS and Cover - if not why not?
cheers
Question #1 I'll answer in reverse order in two parts:
Part 2 - M3 first showed up in WWII, so it is a-okay to include.
Part 1 - No Thompson?!?!?!












If it is not hiding somewhere you missed, then MGP should be


- Shadow4ce
I have seen death, and she is afraid!
I have seen death, and she is afraid!

Pleased i`m not the only one with the rules..
Some questions
1. Why is the sherman the slowest tank around, slower then the tiger..?
2. The tiger tank main gin has piecing 1 ? should that be piecing / 3
3/ Should War at war have its own sub section from standed Evo, since its a new rules system etc..
Cheers all
Alan-Uk
Some questions
1. Why is the sherman the slowest tank around, slower then the tiger..?
2. The tiger tank main gin has piecing 1 ? should that be piecing / 3
3/ Should War at war have its own sub section from standed Evo, since its a new rules system etc..
Cheers all
Alan-Uk
1) dunno sounds off to me...
2) Tiger I had the L57 gun (piercing 1) tiger II had the L71 gun (piercing 2
3) YES absolutely!
Also no grenade rules and grenade launchers seem over ranged afaik ww2.
This is small stuff - the game should work very well I think - look forward to giving it a run through soon.
2) Tiger I had the L57 gun (piercing 1) tiger II had the L71 gun (piercing 2
3) YES absolutely!
Also no grenade rules and grenade launchers seem over ranged afaik ww2.
This is small stuff - the game should work very well I think - look forward to giving it a run through soon.
- Agis
- Greater Spotted Mongoose
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Berlin
- Contact:
Thompson - not included because the Thompson was replaced during late war by the M3/M3A1 submachine gun, and the M1/M2 carbine.
I included the Thompson in the Pacific war draft.
If your minis are equipped with one assume the same stats, all SMG are the same in WaW.
Sherman - Speed 38 km/h (but only for a brief time!) - 3"/7" in WaW
Tiger I - Speed 38 km/h - 4"/8" in WaW
All fine for me...
Guns:
Tiger I: 8.8cm L56 anti-tank gun 60” D10+4 Lethal Zone/1”, Multihit, Piercing/1, Slow
Tiger II: 8.8cm L71 anti-tank gun 60” D10+4 Lethal Zone/1”, Multihit, Piercing/3, Slow
OK?
Both guns are absolutely deadly in WaW, as it should be...
I included the Thompson in the Pacific war draft.
If your minis are equipped with one assume the same stats, all SMG are the same in WaW.

Sherman - Speed 38 km/h (but only for a brief time!) - 3"/7" in WaW
Tiger I - Speed 38 km/h - 4"/8" in WaW
All fine for me...

Guns:
Tiger I: 8.8cm L56 anti-tank gun 60” D10+4 Lethal Zone/1”, Multihit, Piercing/1, Slow
Tiger II: 8.8cm L71 anti-tank gun 60” D10+4 Lethal Zone/1”, Multihit, Piercing/3, Slow
OK?

cheers and keep on gaming, Agis
www.adpublishing.de Author of Battlefield Evolution: World at War and Pacific War

www.adpublishing.de Author of Battlefield Evolution: World at War and Pacific War

- Agis
- Greater Spotted Mongoose
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Berlin
- Contact:
Sorry, can't tell too much...boomgoose wrote:It does seem like the Tiger's gun is powerful. For comparative curiousity, wait is the hit/kill scores for the Shermans and its armor?

cheers and keep on gaming, Agis
www.adpublishing.de Author of Battlefield Evolution: World at War and Pacific War

www.adpublishing.de Author of Battlefield Evolution: World at War and Pacific War

-
- Banded Mongoose
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:50 pm
- Agis
- Greater Spotted Mongoose
- Posts: 1052
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:44 am
- Location: Berlin
- Contact:
Both grenades and "no medics" were pure game design decisions of Matt.soulman wrote:Yes no grenades, but the stats are in the SST playtest rules, i guess they are not that powerful to use in ww2, or that its apart of close combat..?
Also no medic rules, but again i guess ww2 medical knowledge was very poor unlike todays training..
I had written 2 versions for Medics:
1 -like SSt 1st ed
2nd - more or less like 40K or AT-43 medic
Both did not went in; which is -IMO- in retrospect a very good decision.
Medics are just a throttle on Kill velocity.
The design is more on the abstract level (see above - all SMGs have the same stats) - medics just did not fit in...

cheers and keep on gaming, Agis
www.adpublishing.de Author of Battlefield Evolution: World at War and Pacific War

www.adpublishing.de Author of Battlefield Evolution: World at War and Pacific War

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests