Love for the sling? Crossbow vs Bow. Horse Archering.
-
- Stoat
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:25 am
the English owe many victory's to their longbowmen (the yew war bow) in the middle ages. the French owe many victories to their crossbowmen. the Huns and then the Mongels had good bows as well (though it seems tactics were more of a factor for them). perhaps it wasn't the bows getting better that led to the mass disuse of slings, but maybe it more had to do with the quality and quantity of armor being produced. also just the culture of places change. by force or by integration. England had great archers because for a while it was en vogue for commoners to learn the bow at a young age. takes a while to become a GOOD archer. after it fell out of fashion, the Lords of England were hard pressed to field as many as they once had. just a thought.
Last edited by strategos14 on Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
my cats name is conan
This is a very important point. Ancient armies were founded much more on what troops social conditions happened to make availiable than long term comparisons of weapons, though that did occur too. The Romans were very unusual in designing armies on strategic considerations, and even then it was patchy.England had great archers because for a while it was en vogue for commoners to learn the bow at a young age
-
- Greater Spotted Mongoose
- Posts: 874
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: Tallahassee, Florida
AWESOME Article!
http://journalofasianmartialarts.com/cm ... mic-RD.pdf
Wow here's an article about the sling, and used properly, the sling bullet had the impact of revolver round!
Yeah the physics is there to prove it.
11 pages and worth reading them all.
Actually its more than just physics, but its gots da proof!
Interesting how the author also realized you had specialist slingers (baleric and Rhodian = superstars) and you had mass peasant levies for the defensive slinging.
Wow here's an article about the sling, and used properly, the sling bullet had the impact of revolver round!
Yeah the physics is there to prove it.
11 pages and worth reading them all.
Actually its more than just physics, but its gots da proof!
Interesting how the author also realized you had specialist slingers (baleric and Rhodian = superstars) and you had mass peasant levies for the defensive slinging.
-
- Stoat
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:25 am
-
- Stoat
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:25 am
i think its 1d8 in conan. i could see it being more deadly in the game if you specialized in it and all that. but i agree that it should be a least a tad more powerful to start with. better range too. the guy writing that article you have up even said the sling gets no love from most historians. heck, i didn't even know it was used as much up through the middle ages.
my cats name is conan
That was right. Advancement of crossbows and bows lead to long distance and more accurate shots.Kev wrote:Well, bear in mind that's with a modern flight bow built to achieve the greatest possible distance. Medieval longbows had a significantly shorter range, generally around 200-250 yards (though I've heard tell that some could reach 300 yards or more). That's if the archer was going for distance not accuracy.Jotenbjorn wrote:The current world record for a bow is 1,336 yards (2,047 yards with a crossbow).
So we speaks to the makers of the bows, both have lots of advancement in either way.
-
- Cub
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 6:09 pm
Re: Love for the sling? Crossbow vs Bow. Horse Archering.
I've found this link on bow ranges. Definitely very interesting. The range difference between ancient and modern bows is amazing. Though I understand a modern bow has much smaller firing rate. More power and range, though three times slower. I remember seeing a documentary on this, sadly I wasn't able t ofind it up to this day
Here's the link for bow ranges, though!
http://www.archery.org/content.asp?id=8 ... cnt_id=895
Edit: I totally want that pdf on slings. Perhaps you could send it to me as well.

http://www.archery.org/content.asp?id=8 ... cnt_id=895
Edit: I totally want that pdf on slings. Perhaps you could send it to me as well.
Re: Love for the sling? Crossbow vs Bow. Horse Archering.
PM me with your email address and I'll fire it off to you as soon as I'm able.MidnightSun wrote:I totally want that pdf on slings. Perhaps you could send it to me as well.
Alea iacta est
-
- Greater Spotted Mongoose
- Posts: 874
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Re: Love for the sling? Crossbow vs Bow. Horse Archering.
Thanks, Kev, but you already emailed it to me.
Don't mix the Grey lotus with your cereal.
Don't mix the Grey lotus with your cereal.
Re: Love for the sling? Crossbow vs Bow. Horse Archering.
Wait...what? I didn't send it to you again, did I, Spectator?Spectator wrote:Thanks, Kev, but you already emailed it to me.
Don't mix the Grey lotus with your cereal.

Please don't mess with what little is left of my fragile, eggshell mind.

Oh, and who said anything about having cereal with my grey lotus....
Alea iacta est
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests